The curry feud between the two Sri Paandi restaurants in Section 11 has heated up – the owners who originated the restaurant name are claiming that one of them was using the “franchise name” without consent.
M.P. Ariyaputhiran, 73, and V. Ramupillai, 77, the duo who started the Sri Paandi restaurant in 1987, claimed that the name was being used although no shares were allocated to them by the owner as promised. Referring to the older restaurant in Section 11, Ariyaputhiran said there would not be a dispute if its owners K. Saraswathy and husband A. Shinniah gave them a 50% share.
"I was only asking for the agreed share due to the Brickfields company," he added.
“Sri Paandi is a Hindu deity's name and we are using it as a mark of respect. “They should not ask for any royalty because there are many people using this name in other businesses too,” Saraswathy said.
WOW! HOT! SPICY! 50%? 50%? UMNO Youth only asked for 30% and Old Paandi wants 50%???
Sri Paandhi is a Diety's name; you can claim copyright, can you? And even if you claim franchise royalty, you don't asked for 50%; isn't it immoral? Kentucky FC and McDonald, they don't get 50%; and Paandi wants 50%?
hahahaha .... huhuhuhuh .... hohohohoh ... The society is going berserk; everyone is take the cue from UMNO Youth and their Agenda for free money ...... Welcome to the world of Idiosyncrasy; Welome to invest in Malaysia .... hahahahahahah ........
No comments:
Post a Comment