A picture tells a thousand words. A text message can also be transliterated in thousand meanings. Take this message as an example:
PM: Malaysia awaiting formal request for help.
Let's have another message:
Ex-cook bent on winning battle of bulge.
This text message comes with a picture. So, it would have to be read in relation to the picture depicted.
So, what does it mean? The cook has a problem or the Kancil was the problem? Was the battle caused by the Kancil or her size? Does the caption unintentionally expresses a humiliating effect on the person?
Let's digest another:
85% of Bumi projects flowed to other group?
Was it intentional to flow or wrongly flowed?
As all the projects awarded are classified as "Bumi Only", does it mean that all other Malaysians except the Bumis can participate, that all others who are Malaysians by citizenship will not be allowed to survive and earn a living? All government projects under the Design-Built-Turnkey contracts are awarded to Bumis only. Does it mean that non-Bumis are excluded from bidding? But they are Malaysians too? If the government says, it's a government of all people, irrespective of race and religion, then this statement is seditious and a felony. But if PM was to say that those Bumis who are in need should be assisted and that more opportunities will be given to them as compared to the other group, it will mean that the other group will get lesser opportunity, that's all. But these statement is clear and unambiguous.
Time and again, the PM had always enunciated that Malaysia is for all races. But each and every time, he seems to contradict himself with another statement.
Will Malaysia be for all races?
When election time comes, how would the other group vote?
To vote in a government who are all out to exclude them from survival? To vote in a government who would assist and uplift the standard of living and commerce of those who deserve and those in destitute?
Let's take another text message:
A session Court Judge allowed the stay of execution for two former Tabung Haji senior general managers who were found guilty of corruption earlier, pending appeal.
The judge said he made the decision based on the fact that the two criminal had children who are studying and by sending their father to jail, it would disrupt their studies.
The judge said he made the decision based on the fact that the two criminal had children who are studying and by sending their father to jail, it would disrupt their studies.
This is a moral code and I just wonder what's the rule of jurisprudence and the rule of law. Would this set the judicial precedence that in future, anyone found guilty of a felony would be allowed bail (for non-bailable offence) pending appeal because their children's education may be disrupted? Take an example of a rapist or murderer.
Let's have more other messages:
5 comments:
Kasitah Gaddam and Eric Chia also have children who are studying and by sending their fathers to jail, it would disrupt their studies. So these two bums should be cleared of all corruption charges and aquitted. Also, Razak Baginda has a daughter who is still studying, so all charges of murder against him should be dropped. Plus the 2 policemen who used c4 explosives to get rid of Altantuya's dna also have children studying... in fact all the prisoners in malaysia's prisons having children studying must be freed so that they can carry on with their crimes which had been disrupted by their imprisonment. What a caring society-- the 'most bestest' in the world
Ya Allah Illahi! Ahmad Najib Aris who raped, murdered and then burnt Canny Ong to a cinder has 4 school-going kids. So his being in jail awaiting execution is seriously affecting their studies.
The sympathetic and learned judge who allowed the stay of execution for two former Tabung Haji managers who were found guilty of corruption must take the appropriate measures to free Ahmad Najib Aris for the sake of his children whose studies are being adversely affected by their father's death sentence.
So be forewarned: More Canny Cinder Ongs are going to be found barbequed in the drains once Ahmad Najib Aris hit the roads again in the near future, courtesy of the malaysian judiciary system
"85% of Bumi projects flowed to other group"
What a figure of deception.
Cronies' projects or bumi projects?
Who are the other groups? Mini-cronies and sub-cronies?
Bumi or whatever groups, all eat grass!
Courtesy of msia government.
Then what happens to thousands of poor families children education disrupted because those crooks siphones 200Millions.
Niamha.
Bumi project, if not "flowing to other group", then who do the works?
Pardon my saying, this judge may not be judicious enough to judge even his own family.
He is too humane and perhaps what he is doing now, judging, may not be his cup of tea. He will do well as a religious teacher teaching love, sympathy and caring for others. Or he is not fit to sit in his seat as his decisions are marred by his sympathy.
What about the hard earned money of the members of Tabung Haji? Don't they have children or is it because it is Govt money who cares. When you look around this is what is happening, the wastage of tax payers money. Perhaps this judge feels, in his humane way, obligated to the Government and is following the way of the government. Anyone knows when he is retiring. When this happens, good riddance to bad rubbish.
Malaysia boleh.
Post a Comment