MACC men include ‘abuser’, ‘bully’ and ‘the arrogant leader’

RCI names MACC men as ‘abuser’, ‘bully’ and ‘the arrogant leader’
By Debra Chong
The Malaysian Insider
July 21, 2011

The Royal Commission appointed to nvestigate Teoh Beng Hock's death concluded that most MACC officers in its Selangor office were prone to lying apart from being abusers and bullies.

The Royal Commission of Inquiry into Teoh’s death said that “Arman the bully” would “manipulate his witness to obtain evidence.”

“Ashraf the abuser.” it said, was described as Machiavellian in his method to secure evidence.

But what was most damning in the report’s assessment of MACC methods was their description of the deputy director for Selangor Hishammuddin Hashim.

“HH the arrogant leader who would have no qualms about lying as long as his ends were achieved, regardless of the means employed,” the report said.

As a boss, Hishammuddin was also said to instill fear among his officers.

Under Hishammuddin, most officers also had the inevitable habit of lying, the report concluded.

Below are the panel’s other remarks:

• “TBH appeared to have been propelled into a fear-inducing situation as shown by the pattern of calls that he made when the MACC officers were conducting their investigations into the office. He needed reassurance form his colleagues... he was pacified when given the chance by Anuar to discuss his concerns privately for a few minutes with both YB and Manoharan in the SUK building before he was taken away to the Selangor office but when not allowed to see them after that he was cut off from outside world

• “Taking away his mobilephone would have meant robbing him of his means to reality and sanity. And the MACC officers did just that. Thus for the first time in his life, TBH found himself totally and completely isolated from the outside world and thrust into desolation... This was a gross violation of TBH’s personal right, whch would have compounded his anxiety and worry

• “Arman and Ashraf behaved like inquisitors in an inquisition at the second stage of the interrogation. They instilled doubts and fears into TBH as regards the Treasury directives... TBH had to face MACC interrogation heavyweights like Arman the bully [who would manipulate his witness to obtain evidence], Ashraf the abuser [who was Machiavellian in his method to secure evidence] and HH the arrogant leader [who would have no qualms in lying as long as the ends were achieved, regardless of the means employed].

• The RCI noted that HH had been described by his fellow officers as a “workaholic” and an ambitious person who put fear in his colleagues, “Thus, it was not at all surprising that most of his officers... had the inevitable habit of lying.

• “By the time the fourth or final stage of the interrogation was over, TBH would have been almost a mental and physical wreck.”

SOURCE: The Malaysian Insider

Fear of their own shadows

Former KL CID chief Datuk Mat Zain insisted today that Utusan Malaysia’s reported claims of a purported Christian uprising against the Muslims was “artificial” in nature.

He pointed out that it was unprecedented in the country’s history that the Christians, who represent the minority group, had risen to usurp Islam from its position as the religion of the federation.

“In my opinion, only irrational Muslims who fear their own shadows will believe and view seriously this likelihood,” he said.

Mat Zain also reminded Najib of the killing of Othman Talib at Felda Lubok Merbau, Padang Terap, Kedah, in 1985, which he said was the result of an “intense political turmoil” during the Padang Terap election campaign.

He explained that he knew the full details of the incident as he had been installed as the Padang Terap district police chief just three days before it occurred.

“As a Muslim, I was saddened to see a group of Muslims weeping and mourning the death of a fellow Muslim, while at the same time, not far off, there was another group of Muslims who cheered as if celebrating a war victory.

“Even more distressing is that there were other rogues proclaiming themselves as Muslims who took the opportunity to ignite the fires of hostility among those of the same race and religion,” he said.

Mat Zain added that he hoped the event would bring Malaysians to realise that it is not the followers of Hinduism, Buddhism or Christianity who were trying to destroy Muslims but the Muslims themselves.

“We should be ashamed of ourselves and not find a way out by issuing threats and attempting to intimidate those who are innocent,” he said.

Mat Zain said that it would be a clear case of power abuse if Najib chooses to protect an offender for his misdeeds simply because he considers the latter an ally.

------------------------------------
SOURCE: The Malaysian Insider
------------------------------------

The Victim: Cucumber and Brinjal

NST Report
26th May 2009
Page 9, Prime News

Now wife faces probe for report on abusive sex

KAJANG: A man who was recently arrested for allegedly abusing his wife sexually with a cucumber and a brinjal, was not linked to the murder of 8-year-old Nurin Jazlin Jazimin two years ago.

Police investigations revealed that the 40-year-old man used the vegetables to "satisfy" his wife as he had lost the ability to have sex after a recent accident.

He was picked up by police earlier this month after his wife had lodged a report, alleging that he had been sexually abusing her using vegetables for the past six years.

But after questioning by police, it was learnt that the woman, in her late 30s, had a boyfriend, and had used the police report for the purpose of getting their marriage annulled.

"When the wife was questioned by the police, she broke down and admitted that she wanted a divorce from her husband to be with her boyfriend," a police source said.

"At the time of the report, she wanted a divorce but he refused to give in. The couple have been married for 16 years and have four children."

The source added that the husband had used the vegetables during their love-making and it was at his wife's request.

"In her report, the wife had also falsely accused her husband of violent sex," the source said.

"When the woman found out that police wanted to open investigation papers on the case, she wanted to withdraw her report."

Police, however, are not letting the woman get off easily. She is now being investigated for lodging a false report.

Source: NST

*****************************************************
Lessons Learned:

Please spare the cucumber and brinjal as they are innocent vegetables necessary for human consumption as food for the body. Cucumber are nice for nasi lemak and sambal belacan. Brinjal is nice for curry. Please use those toys made for this specific purpose and it is far hygenic and taste better.

Today I eat nasi lemak for lunch. Luckily I read this news at night. Tomorrow I won't eat nasi lemak with cucumber just in case ...

*****************************************

Father rape daughter & pay $1

Father paid her RM1 every time they had sex
By : Adie Suri Zulkefli and Phuah Ken Lin

GEORGE TOWN: A 13-year old girl who was allegedly turned into a sex slave by her father and molested by her brothers for the past five years finally plucked up the courage to lodge a report on Wednesday.

The father allegedly raped her on several occasions, while her brothers took turns to molest her.

The girl told police that the first time her father raped her was when she was 9 years old.

She said each time she was raped by her father, he paid her between RM1 and RM2.

Source: NST

*****************************************************************************

Would a father do such thing to his own daughter? He should be cursed and sent to hell!

Khir Toyoed Elizabeth Wong in the Nude

Bukit Lanjan assemblyman Elizabeth Wong lodged a police report at the Damansara police station here Sunday night over nude pictures and videos of her that have been circulating via MMS.

The pictures are believed to have been taken using a handphone, possibly before the general election last March.

It is rumoured that the pictures may have been taken and circulated by an ex-boyfriend.

Selangor opposition chief Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Khir Toyo said that Malaysians were not ready to accept leaders afflicted with scandals and given this, Wong should relinquish all her positions.

“This is a moral issue and Malaysians cannot accept leaders with moral issues, so she must vacate her state assembly seat.

“Let the people decide and if they still want her they can vote her in again or vote for someone else if they don’t want her to represent them anymore," said Dr Mohd Khir, who last week was detained and questioned by police for taking part in an illegal assembly.



Azmin Ali (PKR-Gombak) said the party would wait for Wong to explain the situation to the Selangor mentri besar.

“We don’t want to know if these are old or new nude pictures. She must explain to us and if she is really guilty of having posed or was involved in the taking of these pictures, we will not hesitate to take action.

Meanwhile, Bernama reported that Wanita MCA crossed the political divide on Monday to defend Wong.

MCA Wanita chief Datin Chew Mei Fun condemned the person or persons responsible for circulating nude pictures of Wong.

Source: The Star and Malaysiakini and The Malaysian Insider

In Toyo's philosophy, Malaysian can accept corrupt politicians from Umno, Rahim Tamby Chik, and all these ....

Razak swears???

Abdul Razak Baginda insisted and maintained repeatedly, that, it is beyond any reasonable doubt, beyond any imagination, beyond any probability and beyond any intelligible comprehension, that Najib Abdul Razak and Rosmah can ever be involved in the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case.

The only truth is that, it was the bloggers, who were spreading lies over the matter . As such, he pleads to the public to be apprehensive of what they read in blogs.

He said:
[quote]
"I implore all of you and the public to stop spreading lies about Najib and his wife. I know Najib and his wife had never met the deceased, Altantuya.

"So much fitnah (slander) has been thrown against Najib and his wife. Those who have spread such lies can never produce any authentic evidence because there are none.

"The truth is the truth and nothing can change the truth."
[unquote]

Asked to comment on why when he was charged in November 2006, his wife Mazlinda Makhzan (right) reportedly shouted hysterically "Why charged my husband, he does not want to be the prime minister" Abdul Razak replied that his wife was under duress then.

The truth is the truth? Why need to affirm in public if its the truth when truth is the truth and nothing can change the truth? Why the need to justify truth on behalf of the truth? Why need to hold a press conference to tell the truth when you can do so in that court of law?

Is truth a problem? Is Truth under threat? Are lies truth, or, truth are lies? That's the paradoxical truth!

TODAY'S CONTEMPLATION


Most fears cannot withstand the test of careful scrutiny and analysis. When we expose our fears to the light of thoughtful examination they usually just evaporate.

-- Jack Canfield

God was gracious to Razak

If you follow the law, the law will not hurt you

If your lawyers is competent in law, he may be able to help you

If the prosecutors knows the law, he may be able to serve justice for you

If the judges is competent in law, they will ensure justice is prevailed accordingly

If the judicial system uses the law, justice can be served in accordance with the rules

Go get a law degree! Sign up with Brickfields College or ATC College now! If not, do self study.

Remember: if you fail science and maths, and dislike technology and art, take law as your only choice; it will save you!

Petrol bomb thrown into Teresa Kok's home

Two Molotov cocktails were thrown into the family home of Teresa Kok at Jalan Ipoh early this morning.

However, no one was hurt in the incident.

Teresa’s parents and her siblings were in the house at the time.

“About 2.55am, we heard a loud ‘bang’ and my son (Sow Kuen) went to check and saw a man wearing a red t-shirt riding off on a motorcycle," Teresa's father told police.

"A warning letter containing threatening words and vulgarities was also attached to one of the bottles which was left outside the house."

There were nails inside the bottle. However, the petrol bombs did not explode.

Teresa's father Kok Kim Tong said he was informed by the police that had the bottles exploded, the nails would act like bullets and could be deadly. Teresa’s mother, Poon Seh Kwon, 71, was at her husband's side during the media briefing.

Teresa's family members are very shaken and now fear for their lives.

"I view this act as most despicable and criminal designed to instill fear, anxiety in me and to prevent me from performing my duties as an elected representative.

"I also attribute this despicable act to certain media groups and blogs that have deliberately demonised and portrayed me as chauvinistic, anti-Malay and anti-Islam," she said.

Teresa said the attack could be related to her recent detention under the ISA on Sept 12.

During her detention, Teresa also lodged police reports against Umno-owned daily Utusan Malaysia, its senior editor Zaini Hassan and former Selangor menteri besar Dr Mohd Khir Toyo for accusing her of involvement in the issues.

“I hope the police can give extra protection to my family members and also to all political leaders. If this can happen to me, it can also happen to anyone,” she asserted.

Source: Malaysiakini

I'm sorry Teresa; I'm not too sure you will get proper protection. You are not Saiful!

Nalla paid RM60mil to Anwar of Umno

NST Report Today:

Datuk S. Nallakaruppan is set to expose all on Parti Keadilan Rakyat's de facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim in court.

"I have five CDs and other evidence to tell Malaysia who Anwar is."

He said his wife had called to say that he had received a legal notice on his statement about Anwar on Sunday.

Bernama reported yesterday that Nallakaruppan claimed he had handed over RM60 million to Anwar, which he alleged had come from Magnum Corporation.

Source: NST: Nalla to 'expose all' on Anwar

Why did Nalla pay so much to Anwar in the 1990s?

Did he give the money to Anwar as a friend, to help a friend, or to bribe a deputy prime minister? If it is bribe, then why didn't he report to ACA then? Under the law, a person who pay bribe is guilty of corruption, and a person who accepts bribe is also guilty. Nalla must surely know that what he was doing was illegal and wrongful in law.

If he was innocent then, he should, by the rule of law, have reported the matter to ACA; but it seems he didn't. Then, the question of his motive and intention to pay such a big sum of money to an Umno deputy president and who was also the then deputy prime minister, comes to be probed. He must now provide the answers this mystery.

Nalla is also a religious and pious person. I wonder whether he would swear at the temple or cut the cock's head

This is the advice given by former Perak MB who is also the Perak Umno Liaison Committee chairman Datuk Seri Tajol Rosli Ghazali:

"He can swear according to his belief. Maybe, if he is a Christian he can swear accordingly or if he wants to do it the Chinese way then he can potong ayam (slaughter a chicken) at a temple.

"But, if he is going to slaughter the chicken then I want Perak MCA organising secretary Dr Mah Hang Soon, state Gerakan chief Datuk Chang Ko Youn and state PPP chairman Datuk Lee Heng to bear witness to [the] swearing."

Source: NST: Tajol Rosli: I swear my hands are clean

Nowadays, swearing is the new fashion to declare and proof innocence. The courts will soon be redundant and obsolete. Muslims can swear by the Quran, Christians can swear by the Bible, Chinese can potong ayam and the Hindus, they can swear at either the Hindu temples or Chinese Temples.

***

Another Swearing News at Malaysiakini:

The season of swearing was extended today when 20 BN parliamentarians followed the trend.

At a hotel in Seberang Jaya this afternoon, Barisan Nasional Youth chief Hishammuddin Hussein led the MPs in an oath-taking ceremony.

Hishammuddin, who is also the education minister, said the pledge was a sign of loyalty to the BN alliance.

"We sign the declaration and swore to remain loyal to Barisan Nasional. This is black and white proof to counter rumours that we will leave BN for another party," said the Umno Youth chief.

Hishammuddin urged the BN supporters to behave themselves as the whole world will be watching them.

Source: Malaysiakini

****

Let's all swear! Swear that you are honest.

Would Nalla swear that he honestly bribed Anwar?

I'll go look for a cock first ...

***

Should Statutory Declaration be banned immediately or made illegal?

Another Statutory Declaration made ...aiyo, what has happen to our country?

Malaysia-Today reported that: [quote] "Thagarajoo a/l Thangavellu swore through a Statutory Declaration, that Najib and his wife, who may be born Muslims, are practicing Hindus." [unquote]

Tangarajoo, a former driver for Datuk K.S. Nallakaruppan, in his statutory declaration also revealed that in 1998 there was a conspiracy to implicate Anwar in sex scandals with various women

(Read more here)

Why has people got to resort to Statutory Declaration? Why can't they go make police report or file a complain with the ACA? or, tell the parliamentarians so that the scandals can be debated in parliament?

Is it because of the lack of integrity or the presence of distrust towards to a system administration?

Maybe, the present government may have to consider to review the laws relating to statutory declaration and make it illegal to make sworn statement against "credible" & "Powerful" personalities. Why can't they trust the police and the ACA and the courts? Why can't we have a government whom people can be confident to expose those scandals?

Are these people lying?

Or, are we now hearing of the truth that could and would not have been exposed if Mahathir is still PM? Or, was it because Mahathir had managed the country and the people so well that they would not speak of such "evils" or would not have allowed such scandalous news a chance to be made public?

I wonder! I ponder!

Anwar bisexual?

It's news! A new accusation from Umno. They accused him of sodomy. Now they are accusing him of womanising. That's bisexual characteristics.

Big News!

Deputy Housing and Local Government Minister Hamzah Zainuddin accused Anwar of making a move on his wife.

I wonder if Hamzah would also go to the Federal territory Imam to swear.

Hamzah had been quoted in the Kwong Wah Jit Poh newspaper as saying that Anwar had in 1998 tried to take advantage of his wife even though they were best of friends then.

He told the newspaper that Anwar had "kacau" his wife.

In view of this, the deputy minister told the daily that the people of Permatang Pauh should not vote for the opposition leader.

According to Anwar's lawyer, Hamzah's words have "(1) directly and/or indirectly and/or by innuendo, given an impression and the perception that Anwar is engaged in illicit sexual activities and/or habitually engages in similar activities, (2) is a man of low morals; (3) is a man of no Islamic values and (4) is of bad character."

Anwar has demanded an apology from Hamzah or face a RM10 million lawsuit.

Hamzah, who is former state agency Felcra chief, was embroiled in a sensational divorce settlement in 2004 where he was ordered by the Perak Syariah Court to pay his ex-wife, Nooraini Abdul Rashid, a whopping RM11.2 million in cash and assets.

The judge also ordered Hamzah to transfer one-third of his 63 million shares to Nooraini or pay her RM10 million.

Nooraini brought the suit after Hamzah divorced her in 1996. Hamzah has since re-married and it was his new wife who was allegedly harrassed by Anwar.

Source: Malaysiakini

Hahahaha... Anwar is not a backside king. Umno members are now accusing him of womanizing. Womanizing is possible because he has so many children.

Would we also hear from other MPs and Umno leaders that their wives have slept with Anwar too?

Before 1998 Anwar is a powerful man. Umno leaders and members were working hard to rub his shoulders and balls, and probably the dick too. Now we have come to know that they were even prepared to loan their wives in exchange for favors from Anwar. But I think their wives are not so stupid to betray their own conscience. But we don't know!

Pakatan is no different from BN

Pakatan Exco is only 5 months old, and they have efficiently get into the acts of corruption (alleged corruption).

The ACA had found RM100,000 in a bag belonging to that Exco at a hotel - it was caught redhanded.

What is there to deny, Datuk Seri Nizar?

I agree that those accused are innocent until proven guilty. But there is empirical evidence of suspicious circumstances which the State Representatives should not have got themselves into; Lim Guan Eng said it is called "Accountability and Transparency".

The Pakatan government cannot deny the facts and evidences. We will let the court decides the outcome but a good government would not accept such behaviors irrespective whether the accused had committed the crime or not; they should not have acted and presenting themselves in such suspicious circumstances.

No one should question the integrity of the ACA. They had done their job and it is this attitude and competency which the rakyat aspires and Pakatan supporters should laud such actions so that the ACA would continue to be efficient and competent.

Two wrongs don't make one right! If we want to question the efficiency of ACA based on conspiracy theory, then it defeats the fundamentals of our aspirations - we want a clean govt; that's why we voted out the BN corrupts; but we didn't vote-in a new corrupt govt and we didn't want a corrupt Pakatan govt either. All rakyat should support the actions of ACA; it will help clean up the nation of corruptors and such competency and efficiency would deter other potential corruptors.

Dear PM, I do agree that we are seeing better evidences of ACA's act of efficiency. We hope they would be impartial and would act without fear or favor.

But, by you being the officer in-charge of ACA it is imperative that there would be biases even if it did not exist because you are in a equally suspicious circumstances. How could we expect the ACA to act against their boss? That's the point.

If you truly wants a professionally run ACA, then make ACA in the mold of ICAC of Hong Kong. Till then, we may have a partially efficient system of control.

Interesting and related reads:

The Star

Malaysiakini

NST

From Posman to ADUN to alleged-Corruptor

Nizar's defends alleged-corruptors

PM claims victory

Saiful swears. Anwar shit!

Excerpt Report from Malaysiakini:

Saiful told reporters that he had waited to garner courage before swearing on the Quran. Earlier, Saiful swore on the Quran at the FT mosque in Jalan Duta that he was sodomised by Anwar.

Below is the statement read out by Saiful:

I feel that the time is right for me to do my duty as a Muslim and Malaysian by doing what is right. With this, I swore in the name of Allah at the Federal Territory Mosque this evening in accordance to the teachings of Islam and as advised by religious scholars and teachers that I was sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim.

The oath I've taken was done voluntarily and it was done to uphold the truth as a Muslim, a Malay and a Malaysian.

I understand that if the allegations and oath that I've taken under the name of Allah are not true, I will be cursed by God and tragedy and curse will come upon my family and the generations after me forever.

I've taken this oath to prove that my allegations are completely true. This is the best way for me to attain justice in the world and the hereafter and for me to redeem my pride and dignity as Allah is the only place where I can complain to.

I've done this for God and I took my oath in the house of God, that I was humiliated and sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim and I do not wish to lie to the world as he has done.

With this, I challenge Anwar Ibrahim to swear by Islam and do it in a mosque, witnessed by religious scholars, teachers and all Malaysians to deny what I've accused him of.

Below are the questions posed to Saiful and his answers:

Who witnessed the oath-taking at the mosque?

Saiful's lawyer Zamri: All the FT Mosque imams.

Where have you been hiding all this time?

Saiful: I've not been hiding but I was quietly gathering enough courage to answer all the allegations against me, especially by Anwar Ibrahim.

Why did you pick today and the FT Mosque?

I've been intending to do this for some time now but it needs mental and spiritual strength as taking an oath is not something trivial or easy. The consequences can be very dire in the eyes of God. Nevertheless, Allah has given me the strength to take the oath today.

How do you feel after taking your oath?

I feel relieved and for the first time, I feel that I've been given the strength by Allah to face reporters.

Was it consensual?

I wish to stress here that it was done without my consent.

Do you intend to campaign in Permatang Pauh?

This is not a political matter, it is a private matter between me and Anwar Ibrahim.

Are the allegations you've made against Anwar frivolous?

Everything happened without my consent.


Source: Saiful: Sodomy wasn't consensual


Puzzled? Perplexed? Ya, I'm!

[quote]
I feel that the time is right for me to do my duty as a Muslim and Malaysian by doing what is right.
[unquote]

I ponder: He said he felt today was the right time to do his duty as a Muslim after 2 months by doing what is right? So, what was right thing to do? Swear on the Quran was the right thing to do? I do agree. But then, would it be taken to mean that the earlier meeting with Najib, Dr Mohamed and negotiating with a police officer and ultimately making a police report was in itself never the right thing? If he wants to do his duty he should in the first place had sworn by the Quran and thereon leave it to Allah to punish Anwar. But he is so passionate to want so much publicity and gaining compassion. By his own words, "it is between him and anwar and Allah"; if that is so, then why he wants so much publicity to proof that his arse was on the line of fire? I am puzzled and perplexed!

Saiful said: [quote]"He swore in the name of Allah and in accordance to the teachings of Islam and as advised by religious scholars and teachers that I was sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim." [unquote]

Ponder: There seems to be a catch - did he say that he was advised by religious scholars and teachers that he was sodomized by Anwar? He was advised to swear that he was sodomized? Or he was advised that he need to swear? And he said it was done in accordance with the teaching of Islam? Tell me in which Surah gave such teachings on swearing? I have not found a phrase in the Quran pertaining to swearing as an victim; the victim was suppose to get the necessary witnesses as espoused; that's the rule of syariah.

Saiful said: [quote] "I've taken this oath to prove that my allegations are completely true. Allah is the only place where I can complain to." [unquote]

Ponder: If Allah is the ONLY place to complain, then why did he go everywhere, including to Najib to complain. Najib is not Allah! And he don't have to take an oath to prove that his allegation is completely true. If the sodomy is true, Allah surely knows; the Quran said Allah knows everything; so you don't need to prove to Allah that you did not lie. If you believe in Allah, you must also believed that Allah is all knowing and Allah is omnipotent and omnipresent.

And Saiful also said: [quote] "I've done this for God ... and I do not wish to lie to the world as he [Anwar] has done." [unquote]

Ehm!!! You did this for God? Oh my God! You can't be doing this for God; you are doing this for yourself and to convinced us human beings that you did not lie; you don't do this swearing for God and God do not need you to do this for Him.

Saiful said [quote]: "I've not been hiding but I was quietly gathering enough courage to answer all the allegations against me, especially by Anwar Ibrahim. It needs mental and spiritual strength as taking an oath is not something trivial or easy. The consequences can be very dire in the eyes of God. Nevertheless, Allah has given me the strength to take the oath today." [unquote]

Ponder: Why do he need mental and spiritual courage to tell God? If you believed that God is all knowing, it must mean that He already knows whether you tell Him or not. Of course the consequences of falsely swearing to God is dire in the eyes of God. But if the sodomy was a factual act committed, he never need to fear about telling this truth to God because he already knows that God knows of what had happened to his arse. I don't need strength to tell God because I know that God is omnipotent and omnipresent irrespective whether I tell Him or not.

[quote]
Saiful: "This is not a political matter, it is a private matter between me and Anwar Ibrahim."
[unquote]

Ponder: This certainly is a private matter between 2 person and God alone. Saiful is right on this. But then he chose to go to Najib for advice; Najib was the first to know. After that, he then went to some specific police officer for advice at a hotel room to discuss the sodomy; thereafter, he went to so Dr Mohamed and then to HKL before he went to make a police report. By involving so many parties it was no more a private matter; it has become a public issue.

It must have been a great courage for him to come out now to meet the press after the swearing. The swearing was suppose to be a private matter; but he went to the press to pronounce the swearing for reasons known only to himself and his lawyer.

Now, it's Anwar's turn to do so. He has to do it; otherwise things will turn against him.

Anwar said if Saiful wants to adopt the Islamic method then he should follow the syariah way and make his complain there instead of going to the police.

"I too have already referred this case to the Syariah Court and the officers there want to take his statement but the police have stopped them. Saiful is under police protection and they have a hold on him and they decide what he should or should not do," said Anwar.

Saiful said it was a coincidence that he was making this revelations one day before the nominations for the by-election. It surely is coincidental!

(source: Malaysiakini)

I hope God will reveal the truth to us; for He is the only source of truth; all others are human's claim of some kind of truth.

labuan MP said he may be the VIP under investigation

Labuan MP Datuk Yussof Mahal has come out to say that he may be the high-ranking Sabah politician being investigated by the Anti-Corruption Agency for alleged abuse of power, forgery and bribery.

Confirming that he was awarded contracts to build a RM24.8 million market and a RM10.5 million school in Labuan, he claimed that he secured the contracts through open tender and that he was the lowest bidder.

"Is it a crime for a company to secure a government contract by making the lowest bid, so much so that I am being investigated by the ACA?" he said.

Yussof also denied that he had cheated a Kuala Lumpur sub-contractor hired to build the Labuan market.

On the allegation of forgery to secure a bank loan, he claimed that it was mere slander and he would lodge a police report soon so that the culprits could be brought to justice.

"I believe there is a political agenda behind the allegation because it was raised at a time when the Labuan Umno division election, in which I have offered to contest the chairman's post, is just around the corner," said Yussof.

According to a Bernama report, a 51-year-old senior politician is being investigated by the ACA for allegedly bribing officers at the Federal Territories Ministry to help his firm win contracts.

The police Commercial Crime Investigation Department and Bank Negara are also probing the politician in connection with the three contracts.

Source: NST: Political agenda behind allegation, says Labuan MP

Why is it that Yussof is being investigated for being awarded projects by open tender? He is only an MP and MPs are allowed to secure projects and involved in business.

Furthermore, he is an Umno leader and Umno leaders do not commit wrongful acts such as corruption, rape, stealing or sodomy. Umno leaders only fight for Islam and the protection of Ketuanan. A good example is the dialogues held with PAS on Malay and Islam unity.

We should not accuse Umno leader. You can accuse Anwar bcoz he is not Umno. You can accuse Chua Soi Lek and Wee Ka Siong; they are not Umno. You can accuse Samy bcoz he is no more a minister. Mahathir is no more Umno; so you also can. Of course you can accuse all the babis for corruption or sodomy but don't accuse non-Muslims for eating pork. Caveat: Non-Umno members are not allowed to accuse.

Brother tried to rape sister

KUALA TERENGGANU: All hell broke loose at a house in Kampung Batu Hampar, Telemong.

An 18-year-old girl, a college student, was saved by her 20-year-old brother who apparently scared off their elder brother who had tried to rape her.

In the 2.30am incident, the 28-year-old brother allegedly jumped out of his sister's bedroom window in his haste to escape his younger brother.

With only a towel wrapped around his waist, the older brother later returned and told his younger brother that he had chased an intruder who had broken into their house.

An argument broke out between the two and the noise, coupled with the crying of their traumatised sister, woke up their 54-year-old father.

On hearing what had happened, the angry farmer stormed out of the house and lodged a report at the Manir police station at 3.50am.

Police later arrested the older brother.

Source: NST: Youth saves sister from rape by elder brother

Girls are not safe even at home. It's not their dressing or other thing that is the cause of rape; it's man, the vulture. Rules and laws must be made to control men, not just blaming the women's dresses or high heel shoes.

Why aren't those religious authorities and political masters deriving methods and rules to control men and the maniacs?


***

Flower Corruption: HKL report to ACA

NST Report Today:

Kuala Lumpur Hospital yesterday lodged a report with the Anti-Corruption Agency over 10 bouquets of flowers it received from PKR Wanita chief Zuraidah Kamaruddin.

The flowers was presented by Zuraidah to the hospital’s deputy director (medical) Dr Lailanor Ibrahim and widely publicised.

The bouquets costs about RM50 each.

It has also noted that Zuraidah had asked the hospital to give a copy of the medical report pertaining to Anwar Ibrahim once it is ready to be given.

It was also noted that Zuraidah had expressed hope that HKL would uphold its integrity in doing its job.



Flowery Crime of Corruption


Macam ini pun salah?

Please don't give flowers to any govt servant even if they are sick or their family member passed away. You may be indicted for a crime of corruption.

Please also don't asked for a copy of medical report - ini pun salah.

Saiful thank Allah for Justice done

TheStar Report:

Saiful thankful Anwar finally brought to justice

Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan is thankful to Allah that Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim will finally be brought to face justice.


Saiful also hopes that all Malaysians will pray that the legal process is carried out smoothly so the truth can be proven in a just manner,” he said yesterday.

I am perplexed and puzzled! Anwar is charged for consensual sex and Saiful thank Allah that his consensual partner in the sexual act had now being charged in the court. If it is consensual, does it mean that Allah is granting Saiful justice? I am perplexed and confused!

Dear Malaysian, Saiful ask all of you to pray that the legal process is carried out smoothly so that the truth can be proven in a just manner. I don't really understand what he means; but I presumed that if two parties had agreed to have anal sex, I can't configure what kind of justice is Just and Fair and can be carried out smoothly in order to convict one party to an unlawful act; it must mean that both parties who had consented to an unlawful act are both guilty of the same crime.

Could a prostitute (who is above 18 years of age) who accepted and agreed to have sex with a customer and then received payment for the service provided later make a police report and claim that the customer had rape and paid her for the sexual act for which she had earlier agreed to perform? Prostitution is a unlawful act; but based on the above analogy, the customer can be charged for rape although it is unclear whether the police would have acted saifully.

Prime Minister Abdullah said that the police were duty bound to charge Anwar because they had to protect the rights of Anwar’s accuser Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan.

“Don’t forget that there is another person, Saiful. You seem to forget Saiful and you think Anwar is more important. This is the issue of the law,” he said.

On whether Saiful would also be charged if he was a willing partner, Pak Lah said:

“You better read your law. If there is rape the accused will have to face action. This is a matter for the law. But I am not lawyer and I won’t get involved. We’ll see what happens in court.”

Source: Pak Lah: I am not involved in sodomy charge

Dear PM, I read law and I understand law. But the charge is consensual sex, not rape, sir?

Dear PM, I know you are not a lawyer, but you have many advisers who would have briefed you on the aspects of the law. In consensual sex, both party consent to have the sexual acts and both agreed to have the fun.

I have read your statement earlier in which you said Saiful must be given justice based on the rule of law.

This is what you said, dear PM,and it was published on 2 Aug 2008 NST Prime News page 8:

“We must remember that the complainant (Mohd Saiful) has lodged a report and what he is looking for is justice. We must not forget him. We must carry out our responsibility so that Mohd Saiful’s claims are brought to court for a decision to be made in the name of justice. In this country, everyone is entitled to justice based on the rule of law."

But sir PM, Saiful is the complainant and he is entitled to justice based on the rule of law. But that is for those who were raped, sodomised without consent or by unlawful acts. Anwar is charged for consensual sex which means that the police and the attorney-general or solicitor-general must have concluded that both Anwar and Saiful had agreed to the sexual act albeit using the backside. So how is justice done when one party who had consented to do an act is accusing the other party of agreeing to act? I am perplexed and I am confused with our jurisprudence and the rule of law, dear PM.

PKR members beat up Reporter

SEBERANG PERAI (Aug 4, 2008) : A 25-year-old female press photographer was roughed up by some PKR officials while attempting to take pictures of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim at a ceramah here on last night.

Loh Hoay Hoon of Guang Ming Daily was punched, kicked and held by the neck in the event at the Seberang Jaya expo grounds here.

"I was bewildered and confused," Loh told theSun today.

"All I was doing was taking some shots of Anwar before he left the grounds. I don’t understand why they had attack me like this," she said, choking with tears and still visibly traumatised.

Loh said afterr the ceramah had ended, she wanted a few shots of Anwar getting into his car.

However, an unidentified man, believed to be an Anwar bodyguard, stopped Loh and pushed her aside, she said.

"I told the man ‘saya hanya buat kerja saya’ (I'm just doing my work)," she said.

She remembered hearing something like "Jangan kacau, jangan buat susah di sini." (Don't disturb, don't cause trouble here.)

Then she found herself being hit and held by the neck by the man and several others, as she was leaving the grounds.

PKR state secretary Abdul Malek Abul Kassim expressed regret over the behaviour of the official, adding that stern action would be taken by the party to prevent a recurrence.

Most party officials who act as guards were PKR members and not trained professionals, he added.

On July 15, during the televised debate between Anwar and Information Minister Datuk Ahmad Shabery Cheek, three photographers were roughed up by security personnel hired by AgendaDaily, the organiser of the debate.

Source: Battle of Permatang Pauh begins...

Malaysiakini reported that: "The Malaysian Chinese Photojournalist Association (MCPA) is exploring the possibility of boycotting all future PKR events to protest the party's attitude towards press photographers."

"In a statement today, MCPA said that the latest incident involving PKR security personnel manhandling a photographer showed that party leadership has failed to control their officers despite previous complaints being made.

"The association said that it has on several occasions raised their concerns of photographers to PKR and that the latter had promised to take steps to resolve the matter.

"MCPA deeply regrets that PKR's top leadership has failed to look into their shortcomings and allowed similar acts of violence to be perpetuated. This is highly unprofessional," said the statement."

Source: Photographers may boycott PKR


Whether it is Umno or PKR, it is scary! They are so fierce and so strong. They can beat up anyone they think they like to beat up. Is this the Ketuanan Thing? It looks like one, sounds like one, and may be one!

I wonder if Pakatan Rakyat and PKR would go public and apologised to the reporter and promised that such incident will not happen again; or, they actually preferred such!

UPDATE:

Anwar's office issued a statement expressing regret over the incident.

The statement said that an investigation was being conducted on the matter, adding that the party held the media in high esteem and appreciated the coverage of their party events.

"We will try our best in avoiding such incidences in the future," added the statement.

In another statement, PKR information chief Tian Chua said that party president Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail had personally contacted Loh on the phone to express her regret over the incident.

A delegation of PKR leaders from Penang has also visited Loh at Guang Ming Daily.

Source: Malaysiakini.com

***

Sworn Innocence or Sworn Guilt?

A Tale of a Murderer & Rapist.

Once upon a time, a murderer was charged for the murder of a politician. In the peoples' court he swore that he did not kill the man. The peoples' court decided to accept this sworn statement as swearing is accepted by the institution as a divine rule of truthful self-declaration. He died many years later.

When he met St. Peter at Hellcourt, St. Peter asked him: "Why did you swear that you didn't commit the crime when the truth is we know that you did? Do you know you would be sent to hell for lying?

The man replied: "Tell me, St. Peter, would a murderer be sent to hell after he died on earth?

St. Peter: "Yes, of course!"

The man asked another: "Tell me, St. Peter, will a liar be sent to hell for lying about his crime?"

St. Peter: "Yes, of course!"

The man asked again: "Tell me, St. Peter, would a murderer who told the truth and wouldn't lie to the earthly court, when he died, would he be sent to heaven for telling the truth?

St. Peter: "Definitely No! He is a murderer and he can be truthful but he remains a murderer and it would be injustice to the victim to have this murderer share the same place in heaven. He must be sent to hell for his crime."

The man asked again: "Tell me, St. Peter, is there two different hell - one for an honest murderer and one for a murderer who lied and who swear falsely?"

St. Peter: "There is only one hell and one set of rules for those in hell; all who are sent to hell have the same fate and punishment; they are all equal."

The man said to St. Peter: "I lived my last few years in a liberal world enjoying all the freedoms and pleasures of life. I know I would be punished when I come here, but at least I don't have to suffer my last few years in a jail."

Tale ends!






A brother confessed to the court that he did rape his sister after watching porn. He was sent to jail. He should accordingly be sent to hell hereafter.

A girl alleged that her brother raped her in their parents' bedroom. If the boy is willing to swear that he did not commit the heinous act, will he be incarcerated or exonerated or exculpated?





News from Malaysiakini

Saiful lawyer Zamri Idrus said he Saiful is willing to publicly swear by the Quran soon that he was sodomized.

Zamri read Saiful's handwritten note which called on Anwar and the public to not interfere with police investigations into the matter.

In the three-paragraph note, Saiful, 23, also said he was waiting for the police to complete their investigations before he swear by the Quran.

Zamri said Saiful was also waiting for the police to wrap up their probe before doing so.

Zamri also revealed that Saiful is still motivated to seek justice.

Saiful just wants everyone to leave this case to the police. "Let the police investigate..." he pleaded.


Malaysiakini posed this question to Zamri: "We don't understand why you are holding this press conference?"


(It is uncommon for a sodomy victim to request for a press conference to plead to the public to leave everything to the police and it is puzzling that a victim who suffered a sexual crime would prefer to swear after the police had completed the investigation to the crime. What if the police say: "No case?" Does that mean he would use the Quran to testify to persist on such a crime? What if the police say there's sufficient evidence of a crime committed; the swearing becomes irrelevant unless the victim wants to confer something else that is metaphysical)

****************************************************************************

This is another article at Malaysiakini:

Experts: First medical report relevant

According to a medical expert, the police cannot ignore Dr Mohamed Osman's report especially if it conflicts with another medical examination done at the Hospital Kuala Lumpur (HKL) several hours later.

"Dr Mohamed Osman's observation showed no obvious physical evidence to support such a claim which could raise a reasonable doubt if the doctor in HKL observed the opposite...," said the doctor who has years of experience in handling rape and sodomy cases.

"Dr Mohamed Osman is experienced enough and couldn't be wrong not to notice the obvious signs like bruises, tenderness, swellings, scratch marks, fissure and bleeding per rectal and so on," said the doctor who requested anonymity.

"To associate tenesmus with sodomy, the complaint has to come after the event, and there would be evidence of injury to the anal mucosa like fissure or scar should be seen (to cause the pain) and there may be also some traces of blood seen."

But she said that since Saiful had alleged that he was sodomised two days before he was physically examined, it would be "almost impossible" to have any trace of material for DNA identification be available unless he used the same underwear that was not washed since the alleged event.

"There would be impossible also to find any recognisable material for DNA identification as well. Thus, asking for a fresh DNA sample is highly questionable because it is not a fresh sodomy/rape case where the evidence is still available."

Another medical expert told Malaysiakini that based on Mohamed Osman's medical report, Saiful had complained about being assaulted by a piece of plastic.

"There cannot be a charge of sodomy unless there is actual contact between the penis and anus. If an object was used, then the charge has to be assault," said the retired medical doctor who had carried out medical examination involving rape cases in a government hospital.

Picture News: The Spinning Campaign

They now scare the shit out of you!

Will you ?

Scare Story 1:




Alor Setar: Muslims must wear tudung in billboard advertisements!

Kedah: PAS MB


Scare Story 2:




Kelantan MB: Hudud Qisas if merger happens!


Scare Story 3:




Pas Youth chief disagreed with Tok Guru on the offer by Perak Umno to form the state government.

Perak: PAS MB.


Scare Story 4:





Saiful went to Pusrawi for stomach-ache complaint but doctor did a diagnostic examination on him for sodomy.


Scare Story with good news 5:




Pusrawi hospital says Saiful was not examined to verify if he had been sodomised.


Scare Story 6:



What's this????? Unrelated!


Scare Story & Reality 7:






What's this? Coincidence!


All on the same day!