It is getting worrisome.
Now we even hear and read that Berita Harian and SKOR had claimed that they were responsible for the success of the students who scored in the SPM.
In it's advert, Berita Harian claimed that their programme had effectively assisted students to achieve excellent results every year.
Had a survey being carried out? Was there any evidence or proof that their programme had illustrated the effectiveness and was the sole cause of the excellent results in the SPM? Has NST, Berita Harian and SKOR had any evidence to support their contention and thereby claimed the credit?
I hope they will show their integrity, if they had any, by providing supporting evidence of their contribution to excellence in the SPM. At least, those in the pictures must be interviewed and an in-depth research on them be conducted to provide justification to the claims of excellence and effectiveness.
Otherwise, they may further claimed that Koo Kian Keat and Tan Boon Heong success was due to the fact that they read NST and Berita Harian which had motivated them to succeed in Badminton because they had discovered the profound truth that it's difficult to find a decent job with a university degree.
Similarly, another paper may claimed that Nicol David had been successful because he had been reading the newspapers and their craps and decided to concentrate on her games rather then be bullshit by the system and the politicians.
Now we even hear and read that Berita Harian and SKOR had claimed that they were responsible for the success of the students who scored in the SPM.
In it's advert, Berita Harian claimed that their programme had effectively assisted students to achieve excellent results every year.
Had a survey being carried out? Was there any evidence or proof that their programme had illustrated the effectiveness and was the sole cause of the excellent results in the SPM? Has NST, Berita Harian and SKOR had any evidence to support their contention and thereby claimed the credit?
I hope they will show their integrity, if they had any, by providing supporting evidence of their contribution to excellence in the SPM. At least, those in the pictures must be interviewed and an in-depth research on them be conducted to provide justification to the claims of excellence and effectiveness.
Otherwise, they may further claimed that Koo Kian Keat and Tan Boon Heong success was due to the fact that they read NST and Berita Harian which had motivated them to succeed in Badminton because they had discovered the profound truth that it's difficult to find a decent job with a university degree.
Similarly, another paper may claimed that Nicol David had been successful because he had been reading the newspapers and their craps and decided to concentrate on her games rather then be bullshit by the system and the politicians.
4 comments:
AAB became PM because he reads NST/BH? Anwar kicked out from premiership because he read Harakah?
Like Bedol and ZAM taking credits for the newfound 'openness' when they couldn't stem the tide of civilian blogging the truth out there.
Tak malu...
Then how the hell come all the Nobel Prize winners (ALL NON-malaysians!) for Physics, Chemistry, Medicine ect do not read NST or Berita Harian and yet score big. Maybe they would have become more intelligent had they read malaysian noospapers
Talking about bloggers being liars... fantastic newspaper...
Should have an experiment. Putting an way below average student and let him "helped by Berita Harian and SKOR... let them work their miracle
Post a Comment