He was just doing what so many the others were doing.
That cannot be considered corruption as it will implicate the whole parliament and sent it crushing down.
The system was designed to achieve the acts and the conventions and the rules made must have changed the character of the "neighbourhood". Therefore, it was statutory nuisance who has been allowed and to be practised widely.
Under the table or over the table, they are all the same.
Corruption has and been interpreted narrowly to mean that the evidence must be beyond reasonable doubt, beyond an iota of doubt. If there it can be equivocal and can have another meaning, then the interpretation will be given the benefit of doubt to the party who is accused.
The system was designed to achieve the acts and the conventions and the rules made must have changed the character of the "neighbourhood". Therefore, it was statutory nuisance who has been allowed and to be practised widely.
Under the table or over the table, they are all the same.
Corruption has and been interpreted narrowly to mean that the evidence must be beyond reasonable doubt, beyond an iota of doubt. If there it can be equivocal and can have another meaning, then the interpretation will be given the benefit of doubt to the party who is accused.
5 comments:
Under Syaria law, a rape victim must have 4 reliable witnesses to her ravishment before she is able to take her rapist to court(What the hell were her 4 witnesses doing when she was being raped? Enjoying the free show?) So, under the law here, as there were no 4 reliable witnesses on Zak Deros's case, it was thrown out.
Was there any doubt in the first place that this case would end this way? Call me a skeptic but this is the way it is in Bolehland...
No surprise. Corruption has different meaning in bolehland. It's called corruption if committed by the ordinary people. If done by the hyenas, it's a noble act and it's lifestyle!
Doesn't surprise me. The whole system has become so corrupted, they won't know its corruption even if its staring them in the face.
Just "normal way of doing business". This is fast becoming like Phillipines under Marcos. We all know how that country ended up like.
What kind of values are we teaching our youngs today? They called it good family values when they split up a poor family. They also called it good values when one is corrupt. It is no wonder the people of Ijok and Machap voted in these people because such values have been so ingrained into them that they now believe whatever the government do, they are all good values. Look at the underhand tactics used by the BN to win votes in Ijok. Hey, that is good social value and the people say "aye!" to it. It is becoming sickening by the day that I wish that the GE is held tomorrow so I can do my part by voting the BN out.
Post a Comment