Federal traffic chief SACII Datuk Hamza said Jeff Ooi's car had to be towed because it was to facilitate the arrival of the Yang di Pertuan Agong.Jeff's car was obstructing the traffic flow outside parliament. In fact the police only towed Jeff's car to the parking bay inside the Parliament compound and no summon was issued.
Did the police do anything wrong? Or wasn't they carrying out their duty?
Was it unkind to tow the car inside the compound?
We had to call a spade a spade. In all fairness it was just a trivial issue and it need not be a headline news.
Meanwhile, Raja Petra Kamarudin was released by the police without his statement recorded.The police wanted to record his statement purportedly pertaining to an article he wrote about Altantunya and Najib at Malaysia-Today. He was suppose to be charged with sedition and also under S.233 CMA 1998, based on a report lodged against him. The report was lodged by a police officer whom the police refuse to reveal.
Raja Petra refused to give his statement and gave the police two options: either let him walk out of the police department without his statement being taken or to arrest him. The police chose the first option.
The uneasy thing about this issue is the fact that the person who lodged a police report is himself a police officer. What is his locus standi, and would it not cause uneasiness to the pubic in general that any police officer can make any kinds of reports against anybody and that somebody will be charged for a crime which the police officer who in his personal opinion believed it was seditious and therefore would himself make a police report so that the police department would investigate and call on the accused for interrogation and possibly be charged for a crime which the police officer is convinced in his personal opinion to be seditious and the whole police contingent giving its approval.
I hope we have not become a police state; it is scary! Where is the IPCMC? It is clear now that without IPCMC the rakyat is at the mercy of a few who had personal beliefs and convictions over certain misdirected ideology and belief system.
The parliament had reconvene. Could the parliamentarians do something essential and necessary to provide adequate confidence that the public and the citizens are safe under the new government? 20 opposition MPs could do nothing; 82 MPs also can do nothing? Something is truly wrong.
Raja Petra refused to give his statement and gave the police two options: either let him walk out of the police department without his statement being taken or to arrest him. The police chose the first option.
The uneasy thing about this issue is the fact that the person who lodged a police report is himself a police officer. What is his locus standi, and would it not cause uneasiness to the pubic in general that any police officer can make any kinds of reports against anybody and that somebody will be charged for a crime which the police officer who in his personal opinion believed it was seditious and therefore would himself make a police report so that the police department would investigate and call on the accused for interrogation and possibly be charged for a crime which the police officer is convinced in his personal opinion to be seditious and the whole police contingent giving its approval.
I hope we have not become a police state; it is scary! Where is the IPCMC? It is clear now that without IPCMC the rakyat is at the mercy of a few who had personal beliefs and convictions over certain misdirected ideology and belief system.
The parliament had reconvene. Could the parliamentarians do something essential and necessary to provide adequate confidence that the public and the citizens are safe under the new government? 20 opposition MPs could do nothing; 82 MPs also can do nothing? Something is truly wrong.
Read news at TheStar and NST
19 comments:
If Raja Petra Kamaruddin who is a true pillar of our Malaysian society and a man who is well known for standing up for Justice & Rule of law can be charged under this offence, THEN I WISH TO ASK THE A-G, JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI AND PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, TAN SERI ZAKI AZMI, president & secretary of bar council, WHY THEY DO NOT CHARGE ME FOR CALLING JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI FOR CALLING HER A CRIMINAL. I believe that since my defence is the defence of TRUTH, they shy away from prosecuting me.
To provide them (above mentioned people) with similar material for charging me under that criminal offences, I will publish my charges framed as question to be asked in Parliament. I was hoping that these questions will be asked, but no such luck. However, I will publish these comments that says Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is a criminal for aiding & abetting respondents Stephen Lim, Wong Kem Chen & Kwong Sea yoon; together with other criminal offences.
I ask Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali to make formal charges in Australia or apply foor my extradition so that her criminal actions & criminal behaviour can be judged by a true & proper Court of Law where the judges are ethical & KNOW THEIR LAW.
QUESTIONS FOR PARLIAMENTRY QUESTION TIME
I refer to the High Court at Kuala Lumpur Originating Petition No. D2-26-41 OF 2001 ; Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd and to the adjudicating Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, of said Petition. According to CHARGES made by one Yap Chong Yee husband of Petitioner Lim Choi Yin, Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had 1st approved all 6 Respondents’ application for security for costs in the sum of Rm.60,000 and upon payment of said security for costs of said Rm.60,000, Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali followed up the receipt of said Rm.60,000 by the approval to Respondent Stephen Lim Cheng Ban a 2nd and subsequent application by Respondent Stephen Lim Cheng Ban for an Order to strike out said Petition.
The second and subsequent Application for an order to strike out said Petition was made even without there being any court order for the SETTING ASIDE of the 1st order for securing said Rm/60,000 for security for costs pursuant to the 1st order made by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali. That being the facts of the case my question directed to the attention of the Malaysian Attorney General Tan Seri……. Are the following :
(1)Was not the conduct of Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali’s approval of Mr Stephen Lim Cheng Ban’s 2nd and subsequent application to strike out said Petition, while the said cash of Rm60,000 security for costs was still held in the hands of all 6 respondents to the petition, pursuant to the order made by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali to petitioner to provide security for costs constitute ABUSE OF POWER ?
Will the Attorney General investigate Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for the criminal charge of ABUSE OF POWER & MALFEASANCE and will the Attorney General, if upon investigation find that sufficient evidence exist to support a criminal Charge against Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for abuse of power and/or FOR MALFEASANCE proceed to lay criminal charges against Judge Zainon for a criminal prosecution ?
(2)Is it not the case that while Respondent Stephen Lim Cheng Ban and the other 5 respondents hold on to the security for costs pursuant to Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali’s order to Petitioner to provide security for costs and in the absence of any Order to set aside the 1st Order for security for costs, the conduct of Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali together with the conduct of the 6 respondents IN TAKING AND KEEPING SAID RM.60,000 not amount to committing the criminal offence of obtaining money under false pretences ? And further, do the facts not indicate that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali together with the 6 respondents had acted with a common intention to induce Petitioner to pay said Rm.60,000 while not intending that upon payment of said Rm.60,000 THERE WILL BE A COURT TRIAL OF SAID PETITION ? The being the case do the facts not constitute a conspiracy to obtain money under false pretences ? The facts speak for themselves as an investigation will prove.
Will the Attorney General investigate said 2 police reports and if the investigation give up facts that will support criminal charges against the said parties, will the Attorney General lay criminal charges against such persons ?
Petitioner’s husband Yap Chong Yee had formally filed 2 police reports at the Balai Polis Jln. Tun H S Lee, in the first police report Yap Chong Yee had CHARGED the respondents Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea Yoon with PERJURY, for having lied in their supporting affidavits applying for security for costs.
In the second police report Yap Chong Yee had Charged Stephen Lim Cheng Ban with FORGERY, PERJURY AND FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE, contained in his supporting affidavits applying for leave to strike out said petition.
Both police reports were annexed to Petitioner’s affidavits as exhibits supporting Petitioner’s application for leave to cross examine said 3 respondents for PERJURY & FORGERY and both of Petitioner’s applications were refused leave to cross examine said Respondents, by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali. The refusal by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali to allow Petitioner leave to cross examine Respondent Stephen Lim and made in the face of the existence of 2 FORMAL POLICE REPORTS THAT CHARGED STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN with Perjury & forgery constitutes the charge of MALFEASANCE, AIDING & ABETTING Stephen Lim Cheng Ban to commit the criminal offences of PERJURY & FORGERY.
Will the Attorney General investigate these criminal charges that are made against Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and if sufficient evidence is uncovered that will support criminal charges, will the Attorney General prefer criminal charges against Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali; will the attorney General formally charge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali with the said criminal offences ?
yeah lar, the jeff thought since he became yb he should be given celebrity status - car missing coz kena towed oso need to call press conference ......
Yapchongyee,
I understand your predicament and frustration and it seems you are far more determine to go heads with the authority even if it means a lose-lose situation for yourself.
It is your choice to do so, but I can only advice you that it is a bad choice.
Knowing how the system works and the disadvantage if any, it is prudent and wise to seek justice via the procedures and rules within the context of the positive law.
But I'll leave you to decide on your own course of action and I think I had advice you enough. Wish you well.
Denzook,
Let's hope all the new YBs do not allow ego and power to go to the head.
The police always say they cannot act without a report. This is rubbish. Someone sends in an anonymous mail report and they will act when it suits them. If it doesn't suit them they won't even bother whether there are reports lodged by real people at the police station. And anyone can send in an anonymous report, just as another police officer can lodge a report.
The police always say they cannot act without a report. This is rubbish. Someone sends in an anonymous mail report and they will act when it suits them. If it doesn't suit them they won't even bother whether there are reports lodged by real people at the police station. And anyone can send in an anonymous report, just as another police officer can lodge a report.
Mav
Scary indeed!
sounds and looks like Rakyat already in Guantenamo!!!
Hello Maverick SM !
Thank you very much for your empathy and public concern for my predicament. It is true that I am in a loose - loose situation IN MALAYSIA, and if I were in Malaysia, I will not be so foolhardy. I too could have abused my influence, like the respondents, Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea Yoon did, because I was the classmate to a few of the most senior Judges serving at that time, but I chose not to and I did not even call on them at all on this matter. I DID NOT THINK ANY JUDGE COULD DARE TO ABUSE HER POWER IN OUR PETITION because our pleading had only one issue, which was proof that a company resolution APPROVING THE SHARE PARTICIPATION OF respondent WONG KEM CHEN EXIST. My wife had pleaded that she never ever signed any company resolution whatsoever; therefore how can such a resolution EXIST ? It is for the company to prove that such a resolution exist. THAT WAS THE SINGLE ISSUE. If there is a proper law and order legal & judicial system that exist today in Malaysia Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali will be sitting in jail today. Malaysia today has only a DISNEY LAND LEGAL & JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
I have written to the A.-G, the President of the Court of Appeal, President & Secretary of Bar Council, many legal practitioners in Malaysia by Email, to the Sultan of Perak, to the Regent of Perak, who spoke of what a responsible independent Judiciary looks like at the Marriot Hotel, and to the Law Minister who wrote so eloquently about what an independent looks & sound like, BUT TO DATE I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY REPLY. I have no problem defending myself in Australia because our judges are drawn from eminent lawyers of the highest caliber; they are ethical & learned in the law. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is NOT QUALIFIED BOTH IN CHARACTER & PROFESSIONAL TRAINING; she does not fucking know the law.
The actions & conduct of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali HAD TOTALLY DESTROYED THE APPEAL PROCESS IN MY WIFE�S CASE. I will spell it out to all my blogger friends reading this post.
(1) Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had approved security for costs Rm.60,000 which I borrowed from my daughters at 30% compound interest per annum. This Rm.60,000 was paid in full and in time. That being the case, according to the law of procedure tis payment is to be followed by setting the case down for hearing. She did not follow through tis rule of procedure, but instead she approved the second and later application for striking out of the petition. She approved this application for striking out even without any order setting aside of the Order for security for costs. SUCH A DEVELOPMENT IS SHEER NONSENSE, because these two COURT orders are CONTRADICTIONS ONE AGAINST THE OTHER. The orders cancels out the other.
(2) The point that I want to prove is that her actions had destroyed the appeal process in my wife�s case on this basis; My wife and the respondents did not appeal against the order for security for costs, THAT BEING THE CASE THE MATTER IS AT AN END, and this will mean that both sides of the Petition has agreed that the case will now proceed to trial. UPON PAYMENT OF THE RM.60,000 the payment constitutes an agreement among all the parties, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, All 6 respondents, and Petitioner. At this point THERE ARE NO EXTRA JUDICIAL POWERS IN JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI to go on and approve Stephen Lim�s application for striking out petition. In approving Stephen Lim�s second application for striking out, JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI. Had acted without judicial authority; she had acted illegally and unlawfully; SHE HAD ABUSED HER POWERS; therefore she acted criminally, because she had adjudicated in both applications and as a senior judge she is deemed to know that she does not have the judicial powers to act in such a criminal manner.
(3) My wife had no recourse to appeal against the order for striking out because the order for striking out was approved without any judicial authority. The proper course in all this insanity was originally for respondent Stephen Lim to appeal against the security for costs; respondents had all applied for security for costs in the sum of Rm.650,000 ALL TO PROVE A NON EXISTENT COMPANY RESOLUTION, which my wife affirmed does not exist because she affirmed that she never ever signed any company resolution. What can justify a security for costs of Rm.650,000 when proof of such a resolution if the resolution exist at all, the resolution will be in the position of the respondents. That being the case even Rm.60,000 is Rm60,000 too much.
(4) That being the case there was no course for my wife to appeal. What we want is to go to trial because we have paid for it. This is such an obvious case of abuse of power and I am AMAZED THAT ALL THE OFFICIALS OF OUR NATIONAL LEGAL & JUDICIAL STRUCTURE, with knowledge of the facts that I have written to them for 100 times and I have not received any replies for, did nothing at all. This situation is like I went up to the Attorney General and told him that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is having a 100 Kg bad of HEROINE, only to see the Attorney General turn and walk away, as like nothing had happened. The same reaction from the Regent of Perak, President of the Court of Appeal, President & Secretary of Bar Council, and all those that I had sent Email.
(5) WHERE CAN I SEEK JUSTICE ACCORDING TO LAW ? I despair ! Will I get justice from the government of Pakatan Rakyat ?
(6) My only recourse is to make all this Malaysian Legal & Judicial DISNEYLAND NONSENSE PUBLIC THROUGH THE BLOGGERS ! I ask my Bloggers to publish this criminal behaviour by our most senior Judge Zainon Binti Mohd. Ali widely. Judges too like all other citizens are accountable.
Bayi,
The police always do their best; at times the best aren't good enough.
Ling Ling Chatt,
What so scary? Sometimes lah; at times, I am also scared; once too often.
Yapchongyee,
I had suggested that you go see Wee Choo Keong and Lim Kit Siang or Karpal Singh or Gorbind Singh.
Yapchongyee,
I should also suggest that you meet up with Zaid Ibrahim as he is the right man and a man of integrity.
Mave,
Agree with you 100%.
Can we have our YB Wee Choo Keong follow up with the matter in parliament?
Hope you are reading this YB.
ewoon,
I hope YB Wee reads this piece from yapchongyee here.
Hello Maverick ! & Wee !
Thank you for your suggestion; but who is YB Wee ? How can I contact him. Please send to me his telephone number. My Email is ychongyee@yahoo.com.au can you write to me please.
My case is a proper one for political intervention because the appeal process makes nonsense of it. My case is still ACTIVE. However, I will be put in prison if I came to KL for uttering matters that are seditious. I will come to KL with support from YB We or any politician MP.
I will come to KL after the Olympics. I WANT A TRIAL TO EXPOSE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI.
Give me YB Wee Email and telex No as well. I want to make personal contact.
Hello Maverick SM !
Thank you very much for your empathy and public concern for my predicament. It is true that I am in a loose - loose situation IN MALAYSIA, and if I were in Malaysia, I will not be so foolhardy. I too could have abused my influence, like the respondents, Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea Yoon did, because I was the classmate to a few of the most senior Judges serving at that time, but I chose not to and I did not even call on them at all on this matter. I DID NOT THINK ANY JUDGE COULD DARE TO ABUSE HER POWER IN OUR PETITION because our pleading had only one issue, which was proof that a company resolution APPROVING THE SHARE PARTICIPATION OF respondent WONG KEM CHEN EXIST. My wife had pleaded that she never ever signed any company resolution whatsoever; therefore how can such a resolution EXIST ? It is for the company to prove that such a resolution exist. THAT WAS THE SINGLE ISSUE. If there is a proper law and order legal & judicial system that exist today in Malaysia Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali will be sitting in jail today. Malaysia today has only a DISNEY LAND LEGAL & JUDICIAL SYSTEM.
I have written to the A.-G, the President of the Court of Appeal, President & Secretary of Bar Council, many legal practitioners in Malaysia by Email, to the Sultan of Perak, to the Regent of Perak, who spoke of what a responsible independent Judiciary looks like at the Marriot Hotel, and to the Law Minister who wrote so eloquently about what an independent looks & sound like, BUT TO DATE I HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY REPLY. I have no problem defending myself in Australia because our judges are drawn from eminent lawyers of the highest caliber; they are ethical & learned in the law. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is NOT QUALIFIED BOTH IN CHARACTER & PROFESSIONAL TRAINING; she does not fucking know the law.
The actions & conduct of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali HAD TOTALLY DESTROYED THE APPEAL PROCESS IN MY WIFE’S CASE. I will spell it out to all my blogger friends reading this post.
(1) Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had approved security for costs Rm.60,000 which I borrowed from my daughters at 30% compound interest per annum. This Rm.60,000 was paid in full and in time. That being the case, according to the law of procedure tis payment is to be followed by setting the case down for hearing. She did not follow through tis rule of procedure, but instead she approved the second and later application for striking out of the petition. She approved this application for striking out even without any order setting aside of the Order for security for costs. SUCH A DEVELOPMENT IS SHEER NONSENSE, because these two COURT orders are CONTRADICTIONS ONE AGAINST THE OTHER. The orders cancels out the other.
(2) The point that I want to prove is that her actions had destroyed the appeal process in my wife’s case on this basis; My wife and the respondents did not appeal against the order for security for costs, THAT BEING THE CASE THE MATTER IS AT AN END, and this will mean that both sides of the Petition has agreed that the case will now proceed to trial. UPON PAYMENT OF THE RM.60,000 the payment constitutes an agreement among all the parties, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, All 6 respondents, and Petitioner. At this point THERE ARE NO EXTRA JUDICIAL POWERS IN JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI to go on and approve Stephen Lim’s application for striking out petition. In approving Stephen Lim’s second application for striking out, JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI. Had acted without judicial authority; she had acted illegally and unlawfully; SHE HAD ABUSED HER POWERS; therefore she acted criminally, because she had adjudicated in both applications and as a senior judge she is deemed to know that she does not have the judicial powers to act in such a criminal manner.
(3) My wife had no recourse to appeal against the order for striking out because the order for striking out was approved without any judicial authority. The proper course in all this insanity was originally for respondent Stephen Lim to appeal against the security for costs; respondents had all applied for security for costs in the sum of Rm.650,000 ALL TO PROVE A NON EXISTENT COMPANY RESOLUTION, which my wife affirmed does not exist because she affirmed that she never ever signed any company resolution. What can justify a security for costs of Rm.650,000 when proof of such a resolution if the resolution exist at all, the resolution will be in the position of the respondents. That being the case even Rm.60,000 is Rm60,000 too much.
(4) That being the case there was no course for my wife to appeal. What we want is to go to trial because we have paid for it. This is such an obvious case of abuse of power and I am AMAZED THAT ALL THE OFFICIALS OF OUR NATIONAL LEGAL & JUDICIAL STRUCTURE, with knowledge of the facts that I have written to them for 100 times and I have not received any replies for, did nothing at all. This situation is like I went up to the Attorney General and told him that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is having a 100 Kg bad of HEROINE, only to see the Attorney General turn and walk away, as like nothing had happened. The same reaction from the Regent of Perak, President of the Court of Appeal, President & Secretary of Bar Council, and all those that I had sent Email.
(5) WHERE CAN I SEEK JUSTICE ACCORDING TO LAW ? I despair ! Will I get justice from the government of Pakatan Rakyat ?
(6) My only recourse is to make all this Malaysian Legal & Judicial DISNEYLAND NONSENSE PUBLIC THROUGH THE BLOGGERS ! I ask all Bloggers to publish this criminal behaviour by our most senior Judge Zainon Binti Mohd. Ali widely. Judges too like all other citizens are accountable.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get the name you always wanted with the new y7mail email address.
Yapchongyee,
YB wee can be reached at www.weechookeong.blogspot.com/
Go to his blog and make appointment to see him.
Yes, Pls get our MP's to take up the issue in parliament
YCY, Pls dont give up if you think you have been denied justice. Get Wee , Karpal, or LKS or Wan Azizah to raise the issue in Paliament. But make sure you r on solid ground. There should not be a shadow of doubt.
Jeff Ooi,
Next time you bloody well park your car in the proper place. You are not above the law.
The moment a guy becomes an MP he sometimes thinks he is right in everything including the fucked up issue of parking.
The are other more important issues to talk about. Jeff should apologise to the police.
To anonymous of May 06, 2008 11:14 AM ...
Before you shoot off your 'mouth', please go and get your facts right. (You can go to Jeff's website for them.)
What a dumbass!
Ewoon,
We often have them here.
Post a Comment