"What good is a leader if the people are no longer with him?"
This question was posed by Datuk Anifah Aman to the BN parliamentarians at the Dewan Rakyat yesterday.
This is what he had to say:
"What is the point of persisting with leaders who have deviated from the right path? Do we stick with them?"
Anifah then pondered about the price of blind loyalty to leaders and the price people would have to pay for this.
"What is the use of being loyal to leaders and, in the process, sacrificing our people's future?"
Anifah said: "Independence would be meaningless if the people could not enjoy clean running water or if children had to walk miles to get an education."
Minister Zahid Hamidi asked Anifah if Sabah backbenchers were tempted to cross over to the opposition. Anifah's reply stumped him and a whole lot of BN MPs as well as the oppositions.
"I am not saying I am crossing over. This matter of crossing over is not a serious matter. What is serious is the millions in 5-States in Malaysia who crossed over to the opposition," Anifah said.
This led Datuk Puad Zarkashi (BN-Batu Pahat) to ask Anifah if he would support an anti-hopping law.
Anifah replied that he was against any law that would stop members from exercising their individual rights. "That would be like a police state. What is the point of persisting with leaders who have deviated from the right path?'
Anifah said the most important thing that the government should work on now was to prevent Sabah from going the way of the 5-States ruled by Pakatan Rakyat.
"The important thing now is for Sabah people not to jump like the Peninsula Malaysians did in the 5-States."
This question was posed by Datuk Anifah Aman to the BN parliamentarians at the Dewan Rakyat yesterday.
This is what he had to say:
"What is the point of persisting with leaders who have deviated from the right path? Do we stick with them?"
Anifah then pondered about the price of blind loyalty to leaders and the price people would have to pay for this.
"What is the use of being loyal to leaders and, in the process, sacrificing our people's future?"
Anifah said: "Independence would be meaningless if the people could not enjoy clean running water or if children had to walk miles to get an education."
Minister Zahid Hamidi asked Anifah if Sabah backbenchers were tempted to cross over to the opposition. Anifah's reply stumped him and a whole lot of BN MPs as well as the oppositions.
"I am not saying I am crossing over. This matter of crossing over is not a serious matter. What is serious is the millions in 5-States in Malaysia who crossed over to the opposition," Anifah said.
This led Datuk Puad Zarkashi (BN-Batu Pahat) to ask Anifah if he would support an anti-hopping law.
Anifah replied that he was against any law that would stop members from exercising their individual rights. "That would be like a police state. What is the point of persisting with leaders who have deviated from the right path?'
Anifah said the most important thing that the government should work on now was to prevent Sabah from going the way of the 5-States ruled by Pakatan Rakyat.
"The important thing now is for Sabah people not to jump like the Peninsula Malaysians did in the 5-States."
Source: Anifah: No harm in crossing over
One important aspect that Datuk Anifah Aman exhorted is the main point of parliamentarians and the ruling regime including the opposition camp is the fact about the interest of the rakyat.
In the words of Anifah, the question of MPs crossing over to either camp is not the main issue but that the millions of voters who had crossed over to Pakatan Rakyat should be the main issue which the Barisan Nasional leaders should have pondered seriously and conduct post-mortem using an internal critical reflective attitude to deduce the fundamental reasons of their defeat and to analyze and reconstruct themselves to a position of strength and to win back the support of the people.
Instead they are spending most of their time in trying to run down the Pakatan Rakyat government and the balance of their time in trying to stopped any cross-overs of their MPs to the other camp.
In the words of Anifah, the question of MPs crossing over to either camp is not the main issue but that the millions of voters who had crossed over to Pakatan Rakyat should be the main issue which the Barisan Nasional leaders should have pondered seriously and conduct post-mortem using an internal critical reflective attitude to deduce the fundamental reasons of their defeat and to analyze and reconstruct themselves to a position of strength and to win back the support of the people.
Instead they are spending most of their time in trying to run down the Pakatan Rakyat government and the balance of their time in trying to stopped any cross-overs of their MPs to the other camp.
This is also the same problem with the Pakatan Rakyat government who spends most of their time looking back to past records and trying to construct a devil out from the past regime; and also trying to see how to get the monies from the charitable organization previously managed by the Barisan Nasional wives' organization.
Why the monies from Balkis, Bunga Tanjung, Baiduri or Bindara were distributed to Bakti wasn't the real issue as Bakti is a renown charitable organization with proven track records. The issue can only be if the monies had gone to the pockets of the individual members or office bearers which tantamount to a criminal breach of trust. As it was, the monies from the wives' organization were given to Bakti and PR should not question the validity even if there is legal points of dispute as the action was and is noble and charitable in itself.
If the PR government representatives are sincere to do charity they should contribute monies from their own efforts and garner the public support by setting up more charitable organizations and ensure that monies donated by the people and any organizations towards the charitable institutions would be properly managed for the absolute interest of the poor and needy. There should not be any ideological and political differences between any charitable organizations as all of them are working for the common good of the people - it is about charity, not politics.
If the PR government representatives are sincere to do charity they should contribute monies from their own efforts and garner the public support by setting up more charitable organizations and ensure that monies donated by the people and any organizations towards the charitable institutions would be properly managed for the absolute interest of the poor and needy. There should not be any ideological and political differences between any charitable organizations as all of them are working for the common good of the people - it is about charity, not politics.
17 comments:
Aaah.. Finally, you are making sense. Most people will not understand though but that's life.
Anifah has no integrity. Sabah has no integrity. They just prostitutes casting their votes/support to the highest leader. Maybe we should just give them back to the Philippines.
But blaming a whole state based on the antiques of a single individual is not fair.
Anifa, Balkis, Bunga Tanjung, Kapal Singh, PPK, Altantuya and the judiciary are all distractions designed to lure public perception on the real issue at hand, Pak Lah.
When TDM said that UMNO cannot get rid of Pak Lah on their own and needs external support, he was not joking. UMNO already gave away 5 states in anticipation of 'external support' to rid themselves of their incompetent leader.
We have done our part, help us and do your part.
Since you started putting up the ratings indicator, I offer my view point to your comments here:
I think Anifah's statement is an indication / call to BN to pay heed to Sabah's plight.
And the transferring of monies post elections is riddled with legalities. Although you are right in saying it does not matter who gets the funds as long as charity is above board, it is the decision making process is found to be objectionable.
And your linking of them together eerr,......not apples to grapes, (;P)
you said its about charity and not politics, have u been to KK recently? there's poverty there. serious poverty issues. but so far little effort is seen from the central govt to tackle it.
sabahans want to heard too. aren't they Msian as well? so, since being in the BN has not done much for their welfare, its time to speak up,.... dont u think? politics la,....
Yes... I do agree with you on the need to move forward...
There is a more chalenging issue right now... we need to concentrate on the future....
If we want to revisit the sin of the past, can we be transparent, honest and sincere in doing that? I dont think so... There will be more political stake involved..
So why not concentrate onm the present and built up a good governance for the future...
We can start of by having an honest, sincere and transparent government with high moral values.
We can say no against corruption and bribery. We can say no to corrupt politicians and corrupt beaurocrats. We can replace corrupt officers with an honest, sincere and tranparent officers.
I also agree that PR need to form their own Balkis or Bindara. Why want to inherit something from the BN just for money...
Show us that PR is not only motivated by money and wealth...
Please show us that PR really care about the people and about the well being of the people, and willing to fight for the needy people...
Jefus,
I agree with you that Anifah is sounding the warning signs to BN not to treat Sabah as an adopted child.
Ya, I did within the article talks about Balkis which is unrelated but it's a concerned of the people that PR govt are but spending too much time on matters which is backward looking and lacks forward direction and this is my main concern.
Letting the time pass me by,
I am in agreement with you that the PR States need to act fast and effective to get the States progressing towards a better place for the people with a system that is transparent, clean and efficiency.
I agree with you that PR government should move on and prove themselves to the voters. Otherwise they would be dumped in the next GE. We know it won't be easy task especially with obstacles/sabotage from the opposite forces.
The Sabahan MP/representatives ain't any good either. They are same league as the MCA/Gerakan & MIC. The Chinese & Indians got the raw deals, they finally awaken and dumped MCA/Gerakan & MIC in this 12 GE. The Sabahan also got raw deals from the Federal/BN for years but was as "faithful" as the MCA & MIC. Very soon, Sabahan might dump their MPs for the Opposition in next GE if they don't standup for them. So now we see Anifah talking... or else he is irrelevant.
Yan,
The BN govt knows their shaky position with regards to Sabah and are taking positive actions to dump more money to Sabah with more development projects. We will next hear of Sarawak BN who would cry out loud too.
monies from balkis, bungah tanjung, this-duri or that-dara given to bakti are not wrong but... would bakti assist these charitable organisations from those state under pr?... yes?... don't think so! wanna a bet?
so why transfer the monies to a 'federal' charitable entity when the monies should be given back to the needy from the respective states...?
actions by those desperate housewives - is it legally or morally justifiable or they just being spiteful & harbour pure hatred towards the people from those state under pr.
and why shouldn't the pr government going through previous government record & make every effort to retrieve those monies wallop by those crooks?
if the badawi/najib administration has decided to punish those folks under pr ruling by withdrawing every single allocation, then this pr government beside wooing investors from within & outside the country they should also get back all the monies that rightfully belong to those state... be it, the agencies from previous administration or charitable organisations.
***cheers
put ourselves in the shoes of PR government now. yeah... theoretically should move on, plan for progress and stuff but is tat easy? any money? any allocations? answer is no. why? cox the discrimination and being overspent by the previous government. this will lead to unleashing of the malpractice and going through back records. so, wat's wrong by exposing the wrongdoings?
moving forward is not as simple as just do it and i think looking back is still necessary.
my 2 cents
CK,
I do not agree with you. Take the case of Kelantan; the PAS govt got nothing and yet managed it for the last 18 years. It's a challenge to those in PR who had claimed they would work and have the intellectuality and wisdom to do things better than the BN guys. Its a shame if they are nothing more than a bunch of preachers who could only perform with subsistence and hand-outs. I know it isn't going to be easy as compared to when you are given money to do things; but its all about innovation and creativity and the ability to get investors to contribute towards the growth and prosperity of the state.
It was a known fact and a known challenge for all the PR MPs and ADUNs. get on with the work and seek the rakyat's continuous support.
I agree that the call of anti-leap law are bad. The frog jumping problem are all about individual virtue and the party quality.
I don't recall any EU country implement anti-leaping rules.
--------------
OTH.
I will keep my finger crossed on PR gaming on Bakti,etc. It don't take much time, but a teaser for PR towards BN.
In Selangor case, in book, PKNS looks "clean" donating the money to Bakti. But bare in mind that, this rarely happens to ANY first world country.
IMHO, this is ultimate stupidity for PKNS to put money in Bakti : why go through proxy? (or should I say WTF you donate through proxy?)
In addition, we see a clear case of conflict of interest, when KT are the MB and Bakti are oversee by KT wife. No first world country mayor/head of state dare to play this pocket money changing hand game for free publicity.
anifah, i think you are stupid. The point is, is not about following the leader(s) who deviate, but rather how you can help the people who have been deviated by the deviant leader. Helping means stay where you are and sacrifice yourself for the good of the people who is helpless because of their leader when you have the power to change.
It's like your country been attacked by other countries and that other countries managed to changed the current government to a puppet government. Is it futile to "dimana bumi dipijak disitu langit dijunjung?"
do you think the other side really stupid to accept people who are crossing over? this jumping people (frogs) would do the same if the current side win again.
Moo_t,
Bakti is PM's wife Jeanne.
PKNS did not donate thru' proxy.
DAVID BOWIE LYRICS
"Jump They Say"
When comes the shaking man
A nation in his eyes
Striped with blood and emblazed tattoo
Streaking cathedral spire
They say
he has no brain
They say
he has no mood
They say
he was born again
They say
look at him climb
They say 'Jump'
They say
he has two gods
They say
he has no fear
They say
he has no eyes
They say
he has no mouth
They say hey that's really something
They feel he should get some time
I say he should watch his ass
My friend don't listen to the crowd
They say 'Jump'
Got to believe somebody
Got to believe
Mave,
I understand about Ktan's ability to do without BN's money. However, again, if you look at Kelantanese people, they are unique and certainly it's too much a difference to compare governing Ktan 18 years ago and Perak/Sgor/Pg now. Ktan and Perak/Sgor/Pg people want different thing and they are two different lot of people with different need.
mave,
i beg to differ from your argument, and agree with cktan. Kelantan is different story compared to other states under PR control now. why? cos kelantan is a rural state, it is not a developed state, with small town, and small scale industries. people life and earn within their communities, they can earn on their land, with small towns, trade and live accordingly.
but for a large urban city like selangor and penang, it's different. the mass population is critical. people work in large industries like proton in selangor, and foreign companies in penang, etc. so if the state govt is not able to collect the return from these companies, in revenue, tax and etc. then it can be difficult for the state govt to promote new industry, and new developments in future.
The reason Kelantan is among the poor now even after 18 years simply becos thier coffers were emptied and being nice not to dig up old issues and bring to book those who abused the powers. 18 years and still going poor, no money, denied money, have to circulate what little money they have. Compare that next door to Terengganu, with substantial oil royalty (oops - Wang Ehsan) and still poor, due to mystical syphonic effect of money grabbing. Then put the whole scenario sdie by side with the current PR run states. it will take another 18 years before PR will be able to reconcile the state coffers. I voted PR simply becasue of these - exposed the wrongdoings and make sure we will never go thru that road again by being 'sucker' to BN.
CK,
Kelantanese are unique; Penangites are also unique and Perakians are also unique.
It's all about doing the right thing and doing well. The rakyat can observe and see for themselves what the new govt have achieve and what are their problems they faced. The rakyat are no fools neither are they incomprehensible. We know what they can't do and we know what they can do; as such they should just work and work and work for the interest of the rakyat.
Electrocutioner,
I also voted the PR in the hope that they would perform better than the previous regime. We rakyat can understand their predicament and what we expect is that they do their best and all for the interest of the rakyat. We can understand their shortcomings.
Post a Comment