Sunday, February 11, 2007

Trillion Fantasy or Fallacy?

Historic figure?

Is it reflecting the international trading position and the economy?

Or did it represent a half truth?

Someone told me, half truth is equal to half lie and it's no better or worse than a great lie.

Take an example, Company A, a Public Listed Company (PLC) was awarded a project XYZ to built a road awarded by the government (PWD) with a contract value of RM500mil. As most of PLCs had over 100 subsidiaries and associated companies, the parent company would then sub-contract the project to one of it's subsidiary called Company B at a contract value of RM475mil which means PLC would make a gross profit of RM25mil (5% of contract sum).

Then B company would sub-contract the works in packages - the structural works to Company C, the architectural works to Company D and the M&E works to Company E, all of which are subsidiaries of PLC and at a total sum of RM450mil (which means Company B makes a gross profit of RM25mil.

Company C, D, and E then sub-contract the labour works to Company F,G, and H and the supply of materials would be procured from Company J,K,L,M and N, all of whom are also subsidiaries of the PLC. In the financial statements, Companies C,D and E reported a forecasted profit of a total sum of RM10mil each and a total gross profit of RM30 for the 3-companies.

F,G,H would also report projected profit of RM5mil each and that would be a total of another RM15mil.

Of course, supplier J,K,L,M, and N would also report projected profit of say RM1mil each which totaled up to RM5mil.

Financial Report:

Company A Group

Consolidated Results

Revenue

(RM mil)

Expenses

Sub-contract

(RM mil)

Gross Profit

(RM mil)

Profit Margin

Company A

500

475

25

5%

Company B

475

450

25

5.2%

Company C,D & E

450

420

30

6.6%

Company F,G & H

420

405

15

3.5%

Company J,K,L,M & N

405

400

15

3.7%

Group Consolidated Results

2,250

2,140

110

4.9%

To summarized, Company A in their group financial results would have posted a total turnover (revenue) from project XYZ alone that totaled RM2.25bil. They only had one project that is worth RM500mil but the revenue from that project alone can be ballooned up to 5-times. Equally, the gross profit would total up to a sum of RM110mil which will be about 22% of Project XYZ, while at company’s level, the profit margin is around 3.5% to 6.6%.

Isn’t it great result? What if Company A had 5 of such projects and continues to acquire other companies as subsidiaries? That’s accounting and that’s financial reporting.

RM1 trillion, is it difficult to make a presentation? It is wonderful?

4 comments:

Anonymous said...

This is the only way to fool idiots to vote for bn as shown by the batu talam by-election. The ruling party needs to win only 50% of the votes to retain its two-thirds majority in Parliament. For the ruling party to retain just a simple majority, it requires a mere 40% of the votes. Source:
http://www.malaysia-today.net/blog2006/reports.php?itemid=904

Monsterball said...

Hi Maverick,
On the subject of the trade numbers, yes, I agree its a pre-election wayang kulit going on.

But I'm more doubtful about your quoted example.
I thought accounting standards require intra-group transactions, revenues and expenses etc. to be eliminated in full ? Such transactions for 100% owned subsidiaries are quite straightforward and strict. Every financial year-end I have to go to a lot of detail to ensure my company's accountant complies. If I try to double count the revenue and profits of the subsidiary and the parent, I'd soon be out of a job.
Similar rules apply for those where we have controlling shares.

Maverick SM said...

Kitykat,

You probably have to have a harder look at the books again, as what was actually done was that the projects will be awarded to an outside company and then sub-contracted back to the subsidiary. I just short-cut the whole episode.

zewt said...

looks like i have found another cool blog...