Or did it represent a half truth?
Then B company would sub-contract the works in packages - the structural works to Company C, the architectural works to Company D and the M&E works to Company E, all of which are subsidiaries of PLC and at a total sum of RM450mil (which means Company B makes a gross profit of RM25mil.
Company C, D, and E then sub-contract the labour works to Company F,G, and H and the supply of materials would be procured from Company J,K,L,M and N, all of whom are also subsidiaries of the PLC. In the financial statements, Companies C,D and E reported a forecasted profit of a total sum of RM10mil each and a total gross profit of RM30 for the 3-companies.
F,G,H would also report projected profit of RM5mil each and that would be a total of another RM15mil.
Of course, supplier J,K,L,M, and N would also report projected profit of say RM1mil each which totaled up to RM5mil.
Company A Group Consolidated Results | Revenue (RM mil) | Expenses Sub-contract (RM mil) | Gross Profit (RM mil) | Profit Margin |
Company A | 500 | 475 | 25 | 5% |
Company B | 475 | 450 | 25 | 5.2% |
Company C,D & E | 450 | 420 | 30 | 6.6% |
Company F,G & H | 420 | 405 | 15 | 3.5% |
Company J,K,L,M & N | 405 | 400 | 15 | 3.7% |
Group Consolidated Results | 2,250 | 2,140 | 110 | 4.9% |
Isn’t it great result? What if Company A had 5 of such projects and continues to acquire other companies as subsidiaries? That’s accounting and that’s financial reporting.
RM1 trillion, is it difficult to make a presentation? It is wonderful?
4 comments:
This is the only way to fool idiots to vote for bn as shown by the batu talam by-election. The ruling party needs to win only 50% of the votes to retain its two-thirds majority in Parliament. For the ruling party to retain just a simple majority, it requires a mere 40% of the votes. Source:
http://www.malaysia-today.net/blog2006/reports.php?itemid=904
Hi Maverick,
On the subject of the trade numbers, yes, I agree its a pre-election wayang kulit going on.
But I'm more doubtful about your quoted example.
I thought accounting standards require intra-group transactions, revenues and expenses etc. to be eliminated in full ? Such transactions for 100% owned subsidiaries are quite straightforward and strict. Every financial year-end I have to go to a lot of detail to ensure my company's accountant complies. If I try to double count the revenue and profits of the subsidiary and the parent, I'd soon be out of a job.
Similar rules apply for those where we have controlling shares.
Kitykat,
You probably have to have a harder look at the books again, as what was actually done was that the projects will be awarded to an outside company and then sub-contracted back to the subsidiary. I just short-cut the whole episode.
looks like i have found another cool blog...
Post a Comment