Why does Johar had to say that? Let's hear what he said:
The decision to drop the attempted murder charge against 31 people arrested at an illegal assembly in Batu Caves does not mean the authorities will go soft on rule violators, and neither does it reflect any future decision made against the group.
Deputy Internal Security Minister Datuk Johari Baharom said as far as the Government was concerned, it would not tolerate any group that threatened the country’s peace and security.
“Whatever decision made (on the 31 people) does not mean that we will go soft. Stern action will be taken against those who are a threat to the country’s security.
“We will continue to be strict on this matter. We will not compromise anything that involves national security,” he said yesterday, at the ministry’s quality and integrity day.
Dear Johari, are you saying that it was the government's decision on the 31 Hindraf's release and not the Attorney-General's decision? You are a minister and AG is a government servant who is employed to dispense the job of a legal advocate and Barrister. Are you suggesting that it was the Prime Minister's directive to the AG to drop the charges? If that's the case, you would have implied that the prime minister can direct the AG to drop any cases such as those of corruption and abuses of power, and it brings us to the hypothesis, that is, was the PM involved in the investigation and dropping of cases involving you, the IGP and the former ACA chief who were all investigated for corruption and abuses. There is also the Zakaria case, the Close-One-Eye case, and also Nazri's case with the taxi permits.
Dear Johari, whatever you had said in this article about the need to uphold national security is correct, correct, correct. But what about the video of koret, koret, koret? And what about Rahim Tamby Chik's threat to parang... have you forgotten and are the police and AG also waiting for the PM's instruction?
Hope to hear from you soon, and Selamat Hari Raya Aidil Adha.
Oh, BTW, En Johari, did you read an interesting news at TheStar today? Let me share with you in case you did not observed it.
Deputy Internal Security Minister Datuk Johari Baharom said as far as the Government was concerned, it would not tolerate any group that threatened the country’s peace and security.
“Whatever decision made (on the 31 people) does not mean that we will go soft. Stern action will be taken against those who are a threat to the country’s security.
“We will continue to be strict on this matter. We will not compromise anything that involves national security,” he said yesterday, at the ministry’s quality and integrity day.
Dear Johari, are you saying that it was the government's decision on the 31 Hindraf's release and not the Attorney-General's decision? You are a minister and AG is a government servant who is employed to dispense the job of a legal advocate and Barrister. Are you suggesting that it was the Prime Minister's directive to the AG to drop the charges? If that's the case, you would have implied that the prime minister can direct the AG to drop any cases such as those of corruption and abuses of power, and it brings us to the hypothesis, that is, was the PM involved in the investigation and dropping of cases involving you, the IGP and the former ACA chief who were all investigated for corruption and abuses. There is also the Zakaria case, the Close-One-Eye case, and also Nazri's case with the taxi permits.
Dear Johari, whatever you had said in this article about the need to uphold national security is correct, correct, correct. But what about the video of koret, koret, koret? And what about Rahim Tamby Chik's threat to parang... have you forgotten and are the police and AG also waiting for the PM's instruction?
Hope to hear from you soon, and Selamat Hari Raya Aidil Adha.
Oh, BTW, En Johari, did you read an interesting news at TheStar today? Let me share with you in case you did not observed it.
The Duke University had discovered that monkeys performed about as well as parliamentarians at mental addition. Jessica Cantlon, a cognitive neuroscience researcher at Duke University research study shows that monkeys performed about as well as college students at mental addition.
The research follows the findings by Japanese researchers earlier that young chimpanzees performed better than human adults at a memory game.
“It shows when you take language away from a human, they end up looking just like monkeys in terms of their performance,” said Jessica Cantlon whose work appeared in the Public Library of Science Journal PLoS Biology (www.plosbiology.org )
The research follows the findings by Japanese researchers earlier that young chimpanzees performed better than human adults at a memory game.
“It shows when you take language away from a human, they end up looking just like monkeys in terms of their performance,” said Jessica Cantlon whose work appeared in the Public Library of Science Journal PLoS Biology (www.plosbiology.org )
Jessica’s study shows that monkeys performed about as well as college students at mental addition. The research follows the findings by Japanese researchers earlier that young chimpanzees performed better than human adults at a memory game.
So, do you think our parliamentarians could perform better than the monkeys?
Dear Johari, do you remember who called us, the bloggers, monkeys?
Well, this article proved that we bloggers have monkey mental mode and have performed better than those monkeys in the zoo at the parliament.
Dear Johari, do you remember who called us, the bloggers, monkeys?
Well, this article proved that we bloggers have monkey mental mode and have performed better than those monkeys in the zoo at the parliament.
Thanks and bye.
6 comments:
National Security
http://www.google.com.my/url?sa=X&start=3&oi=define&q=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National+security&usg=AFQjCNHZ8UmofCoLKOC4aTYFlzauZ1cXpQ
"National security refers to the requirement to maintain the survival of the nation-state through the use of economic, military and political power and the exercise of diplomacy. "
So
1. Survival of the national-state - the target.
2. Economic, military, political power and diplomacy - the ways!
Q: 50,000 in a walk had not threatened the survival, so, cannot claim the 30,000!!
Q: Had the last walks involved -economic, e.g. strike
-military, guns, explosives, etc..
-political power, e.g. PM. MPs, parties?
-diplomacy, had UK or British H C been supporting?
A: NO, except bricks - but no evidence who uses the bricks!! Even so, it should not be taken as threaten of National Survival!
The pending matter is
"16 changed their plea to guilty to the charge of causing damage to seven cars and two gates of the temple under Section 149/440 of the Penal Code."
Q: If the police not using water cannon or teargas and violence, will these happened.
The facts that there are damages cannot mop away the cause?
From
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ibCkdBMDPxY&feature=related
Police had been surrounding the Temple long time ago with People shut in the Temple. They have some exchange of words when they went out of the temple. Before the Police used the Teargas and water cannon, the People were in and gate seemed closed. Therefore, in between the People had no need to break the Gate. When and how the gate was damaged is one good question.
2. Since Police were early outside the Temple, so how can People damage the cars if outside? And, surely People will not damage their own cars when inside the Temple.
Police should have taken video, and all should have a clear look on what happened!!
Most probably it is too late if they had already plea guilty!!
in the bolehland, as long as u got the dough, the law is always there for you to screwed around...
the judiciary is this country suck, big time too...
& the internal security ministry is not worth our drop of semen.
In haste to display the power of office this guy betrays openly to the whole world that the M'sian Gomen is above the Law by his own pronouncement.
Can anyone accomplish a better fulat job?
Sharing,
Ya, you found what's national security...
Beeranyone,
Yes, money talks and money makes them talk cents.
Wits0,
Yes, no one can accomplish a better niapeh fulat
Alamak, i feel sorry for the "people" who don't even have the IQ of a monkey....I am luckily the bloggers, i am stupid and ediot, but at least i have the ability of a monkey....haiz..
Maverick,
In Monkey Kingdom, one has to learn the wordings used by the Monkey. Or, too dangerous to walk in the Kingdom!
Sorry, I should say Jungle instead of Kingdom when talking to you being an human!!
Post a Comment