Hindraf: Don’t boycott nasi kandarHindraf is instructing all Penangites should stop boycotting nasi kandar. The advice came from Hindraf coordinator R.S. Thanenthiran.
The boycott apparently took effect following the circulation of an SMS alleging that nasi kandar operators were involved in last Friday’s street protest at Komtar.
Thanenthiran said the allegation was baseless and Hindraf did not issue any such statement or SMS.
“This is an act by some irresponsible parties,” Thanenthiran told a press conference Friday.
The SMS calling for a boycott of nasi kandar ended with the Hindraf slogan Makkal Sakthi (People’s Power), he said.
“People who received the SMS were misled into thinking that it was Hindraf who had sent the SMS but we did not.”
“We appeal to the people of all races to support the nasi kandar operators as the cuisine is the pride of Penang,” Thanenthiran said.
(Source: TheStar Online)
But Thanenthiran did not insist that Hindraf is now the authority to call for boycott or protest. What he emphasized is that the SMS was not a directive from Hindraf. So, if it is not, therefore we should not be misled. If it is, I suppose it must mean that we are rightly led.
Meanwhile, it is reported by Malaysiakini that the four Hindraf leaders presently being detained under the ISA in Kamunting today urged that their fellow detainee and Kota Alam Shah state representative M Manoharan is appointed as a deputy menteri besar in Selangor.
The four - P Uthayakumar, R Kenghadharan, V Ganabatirau and T Vasantha Kumar - said they unanimously believed that Manoharan should represent the Indian community in the new state government.
“Hindraf has contributed enormously in the last election to ensure the victory for DAP, PKR and PAS,” they said in a March 19 joint-statement which was smuggled out of the detention centre.
“Manoharan, being a Hindraf leader and a DAP stalwart should be given due recognition by appointing him to the post of deputy menteri besar,” they said, adding that the appointment would make “his unlawful detention less painful”.
(Source: Malaysiakini)
Well, Mamaks restaurants and nasi kandar owners in Selangor should be prepared for any calls for boycott because it is apparent that there will not be any deputy MB for Selangor, and even if there is, the Sultan wants a Malay Muslim, not a Chinese nor an Indian. We hope Hindraf will not sent SMS for a boycott; otherwise nasi kandar will be in trouble.
3 comments:
Yapchongyee,
5a Prinsep Road,
Attadale, WA6156
Email : ychongyee@yahoo.com
Blogg. :http://yap.chongyee.blogspot.com
Dear Sir, Raja Petra,
I have been trying very hard to get included in your list of Bloggers. I graduated in law from the University of Singapore in 1967 and practised at the Malaysian Bar from 1968 to 1978 when I emigrated to Australia. I do not have too many accomplishments to mention.
In 2001 my wife took out a petition in the KL High Court and the said petition was adijucated by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali who acted to AID & ABET THE THREE respondents Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea yoon. The respondents perjured in their affidavits and Stephen Lim supported his application for striking out with documents that were clearly forged but Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali unjustly forbid the cross examination of the respondents to prove that they had committed the criminl offences.
Since the unlawful & illegal treatment by Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali I have taken to CAMPAIGNING FOR A DECENT AND ETHICAL AND HONEST JUDICIARY. It is for this reason that I want to blogg on your electronic newspaper. I have been busy supporting Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim in his campaign to re-enter Malaysian politics. I do not know him at a personal level but I know that for Malaysia to succeed in a Globalised world, we need a progressive and strong leader and I strongly believe that Anwar is that leader.
I also believe that an INDEPENDANT JUDICIARY CAN BE PUT IN PLACE EVEN AS WE SPEAK, BECAUSE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI HAD IN THE COURSE OF HER PERFORMANCE ON THE BENCH WHEN ADJUCATING MY WIFE'S PETITION HAD COMMITTED CRIMINAL OFFENCES FOR WHICH SHE IS REQUIRED TO FACE CRIMINAL CHARGES. In any half decent democratic nation anywhere in the world the CRIMINAL CONDUCT OF JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI would be in court a very long time ago. I had written many letters published on the internet to the Malaysian A-G, Chief Judge Malays, Chief Justice of Malaysia, President & Secretary of the Malaysian Bar, but for over 2 years of writing letters as you can read on my blogg. at http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com; and I still have not got any reply whatsoever.
I will come to KL to face off against Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali after the Beijing Olympics. I want the 3 question to be asked in Parliament as a condition for my travel to KL. What justice can I expect if the judges who will try my probable sedition case are just the same lot of corrupt and bias an unethical judges ? What is the profit to behave like a Don Quixote tilting at wind mills ?
If I can blog on your electronic newspaper, I would like you to post the letter that I had earlier sent to both Datin Seri Dr. Wan Azizzah as leader of the OPPOSITION and to the MP for Batu Gajah YB. Miss Fong Po Kuan, and to them too I had to post those letters on their respective blogg. because I do not know how to get those letters to them at their formal address.
Yap Chong Yee,
5a Prinsep Road,
Attadale, WA 6156,
Western Australia,
Email :yap.chongyee@yahoo.com,
Blogg. :http://yap.chongyee.blogspot.com
Dear YB. MISS FONG PO KUAN,
Re :APPEAL TO YB. MISS FONG PO KUAN TO
ASK 3 QUESTION IN PARLIAMENT
I write to Dato Seri as the leader of the opposition in Parliament. I have been unjustly aggrieved by the criminal behaviour of Dato Zainon binti Mohd.Ali when she sat as High Court Bench adjudicating my wife’s application by ORIGINATING PETITION No : D-2-26-41-01 in the High Court, KL Judge Datin Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had perverted the course of justice, committed aiding & abetting respondents in PERJURY & FORGERY, she committed the criminal offence of Malfeasance.
I am writing this same letter to YB. Miss Fong Po Kuan as a Member of Parliament. I appeal to both of your Excellency to ask 3 questions in Parliament because the criminal behaviour of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali has illegally and unlawfully rendered my wife’s petition without any remedy at all whatsoever. I graduated in Law in 1967 from the University of Singapore and I practiced law in KL until we emigrated to Asutralia in 1978. The details of how and why Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali committed these acts are set out below. The short statement for what Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali did to KILL MY WIFE’S PETITION and deny it all remedy is that by her awarding to respondents BOTH (1) Order for security for costs and after my wife had paid the sum of ringgit 60,000 Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali went on to award to respondents another order to strike out said petition. (2) the later and subsequent order to strike out said petition CANNOT BE AWARDED BECAUSE THEY ARE 2 SIDES OF THE SAME COING; because to award the said 2 ORDERS IS TO STRIKE OUT ONE AGAINST THE OTHER (one is + and the other is – and if you add the 2 it will become zero).
I believed the PKR, PAS and the DAP coalition when they campaigned on the platform (among other issues) of the dire need to reform the Judiciary and to give the nation a clean, transparent, and independent judiciary that is ethical and corruption free. I believe that this GOVERNMENT IN WAITING OF THE UNITED FRONT that has just dealt a devastating blow to the integrity and very survival of the Barisan National and that this government in waiting can deliver this change to the Judiciary even as we speak; and that my way is the best way to achieve this transformation to a clean judiciary. What could be more effective than to put a Judge of the Highest Court in Malaysia ( Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is now a judge in the COURT OF APPEAL) in jail for having committed several crimes while Adjudicating my wife’s Petition to wit, Originating Petition No. D2-26-41-01 in the High Court , Kuala Lumpur, re : Lim Choi Yin vs. McLaren Saksama (Malaysia)Sdn. Bhd.
I have written copiously on the illegality of the actions of Judge dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and her criminal conduct; just go to my blogg. At http://yap.chongyee.blogspot.com. I have at all times sent a copy of any letters to the Attorney general, Chief Judge of the High Curt of Malaya, President & Secretary of the Malaysian Bar Council and to many practicing lawyers randomly and others randomly as well.
My way is to force the Judiciary to ENFORCE THE LAW of Malaysia and not to pervert the course of justice, as they are now doing BY NOT OBLIGATING THEMSELVES TO ENFORCE THE LAW. In all of my years practicing at the Bar, I, like all those who are now practicing at the Malaysian Bar never at anytime know that by the English Common Law that is incorporated under the Malaysian Constitution to become the Law of Malaysia, there exist a law called MALFEASANCE which is both a criminal offence and a TORT as well, any government official (JUDGES AS WELL) who fails to DO WHAT HE IS REQUIRED TO DO BY LAW COMMITS THE OFFENCE OF MALFEASANCE AND CAN BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE.
Therefore by the law of malfeasance I CHARGE JUDGE DATO ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI of the Malaysian Court of Appeal with having deliberately refusing to grant leave to Petitioner at her application to cross examine the respondents Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea Yoon for committing PERJURY & Forgery; the supporting submission are discussed in my blogg. Cited above. This submission is too long for the average to read through, hence I will set out and discuss a shorter way towards prosecuting Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali.
This shorter way is to discuss one of the many issues that will penalize Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for breach of the Malaysian Penal Code, and the facts are as follows :
(1) Respondents applied for security for costs in the sum of ringgit 650,000 to prove 1 sheet of paper namely ONE COMPANY RESOLUTION. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali approved this application but at the reduced sum of ringgit 60,000 which my wife paid and was received by respondents as SECURITY FOR COSTS. The Law of Civil Procedure mandates that when security for costs is paid it automatically follows that the Petition must be tried in court.
(2) At the payment by my wife of the said ringgit 60,000 Stephen Lim Cheng Ban quickly applied to strike out said petition IN ORDER TO STOP THE FURTHER PROGRESS OF SAID PETITION. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali approved his application; this second approval and award of the order to strike out said petition is unlawful and illegal. Arising from this criminal behaviour are several breaches of the Criminal Penal Code. Full details are discussed in my Blogg.
(3) The deliberate criminal behaviour of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali has buried unjustly and illegally my wife’s petition and leave us with no recourse for Justice before the Law.
I appeal to YB. Datin Wan Azziza as leader of the opposition, and to YB Miss Fong Po Kuan to ask 3 question in Parliament so that those issues can be investigated by the Attorney General’s Department with a view to prosecute Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali and her accomplices fro breaches of the Criminal Penal Code.
I again appeal to both of your Excellency to ask the following questions :
(1)WHY DID JUDGE DATO ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI APPROVE SIMULTANEOUSLY (A) ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS AND WHEN RINGGIT 60,000 WAS PAID TOWARDS SECURITY FOR COSTS SHE WENT ON (B) TO ORDER FOR THE STRIKING OUT SAID PETITION.
(2) The Order for security for costs was performed by Petitioner and she paid the required sum of ringgit 60,000 towards it and yet there was no application by Mr Stephen Lim Cheng Ban or any of the respondents to REMOVE THE AWARD FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS BEFORE THEY SUBMITTED THEIR APPLICATION FOR STRIKING OUT SAID PATITION, THEREFORE HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI TO EVEN CONSIDER RESPONDENTS’ APPLICATION FOR STRIKING OUT OF SAID PETITION, because the Order for security for costs is still a “LIVE PETITION”.
(4) The legal position of the ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS in accordance with the FACTS OF THIS CASE (security for costs having been paid and accepted by respondents) and in according to the law of Civil Procedure cannot be rendered void; because Petitioner’s performance of the Order for security for costs was accepted by all the respondents of the ringgit 60,000 and Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali had on her own initiative amended the ORDER FOR PAYMENT; therefore the performance of the order of security for costs was already acted upon by all parties, Petitioner, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and all respondents. This position cannot be altered by Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and the behest of the respondents alone. Therefore, the question to the Parliament is WHAT REASON CAN JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI GIVE TO JUSTIFY HER CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR ?
If the BARISAN ALTERNATIVE is serious about reforming the JUDICIARY so that Malaysia can again have a judiciary that we can all be proud of and a judiciary that will deliver JUSTICE ACCORDING TO LAW, then you have the best OPPORTUNITY TO ACHIEVE THIS OUT COME.
I HAD INTENDED NOT TO PUBLISH this letter on my blogg but I have not been able to find your address in Batu Gajah so I am taking the easier way to publish this letter as usual. I will also publish this letter on Dato Seri blogg as I have been doing so over the election. YB. Datin Azziza and YB. Miss Fong Po Kuan MP for Batu Gajah. May I suggest that the Lingam Types did a lot of good for the Barisan Alternative and I believe that the issues arising from my wife’s petition will do even more to clean the Malaysian Judiciary; it has come at a time when Dato Seri is riding the crest of the wave.
THANK YOU TO BOTH OF YOUR EXCELLENCY !
I am Yours Faithfully Yap Chong Yee.
Yapchongyee, try
http://pokuan.blogsome.com/
and
http://anwaribrahimblog.com/
Yap,
I hope those with power would assist you; I'm sure they would.
Post a Comment