Whose money is it?Wives of Selangor Assemblymen and Mps or the Charity organization Balkis?
PKNS donated:
• RM218,719 for the opening ceremony of Komplex Wawasan Balkis;
• RM200,000 for the Balkis dinner;
• RM10,000 for a table at the same dinner; and
• RM161,660 for programmes organised by Balkis.
Total amount remaining in the accounts amounted to RM9.9mil.
Datin Seri Zahrah Kechik said she had the legal right to transfer the money anywhere she like as her husband was at the caretaker MB.So, does a caretaker MB has the power and authority of an MB?
Does she knows what is "Functus Officio?
Which legal adviser told her she had the power and legal rights? Maybe, some kind lawyers should explain to her what is functus officio.
Find out here
15 comments:
I don't think Datin Seri Zahrah Kechik consulted anyone. I saw the news on TV7 this evening. Apparently not even the auditors were consulted. The accounts for the previous year were also not presented yet. I get the impression she was running (maybe still is) Balkis like a sole proprietorship.
Probably her husband told her, "Semuanya OK!"
Senior Mav
"everybody wants to rule the world"
i guess everyone from UMNO/BN leaders would like to claim leadership even in gone case situation...
just why everybody wants to rule the world when it is tough to rule oneself hah???
thim-kai leh...
ngor emm-chii thou a..
account in 2007 not presented yet? no wonder ROS reject its dissolution!!!
should change to Toyol Sdn Bhd instead then Zahrah Kechik can run like how she want
CK Tan said...
should change to Toyol Sdn Bhd instead then Zahrah Kechik can run like how she want
================================================
toyol sdn bhd.... funnie!!!!
Toyol Sdn Bhd...hahahahaha!!!
This term is applied to something which once had life and power, but which now has no virtue whatsoever. E.g., When an agent has completed the business with which he was entrusted, his agency is functus officio.
Lucky for malaysians the RM9.9million swindler was born Datin Seri Zahrah Kechik. If she was born Datin Seri Zahrah Besar, the amount swindled would had reached RM9.9billion
Like husband like wife, both are crooks and thieves.
have to look at how the law stipulates regarding funds during transfer of power,...
what was her intent?
need to start weeding out corruption. otherwise, there is no change, just like Pak Lah, Mr Clean. Remember?
what was her intent?
To pump up her gold bullion in her swiss bank accounts
Maybe Pak Lah should take the opportunity and do something about this. Get back the rakyat's confidence in him.
Intended expenses cost less than a single dinner and RM10m in the account! This is way worse than spore's NKF saga.
RM10k dinner table got extra service or not? No nightclub charge at that rate leh.
I hope this is the time that the new State government needs to show some colours on who is NOW incharge - and, any form of hanky panky will not be tolerated.
If criminal intent can be proven.
both husband and wife cannot be expected to get away.
Bakti should also be reprimanded to be in cohorts with such characters.
Bayi,
An organization is a separate legal entity, and that includes a charitable organization.
Thus, each organization is governed by its own constitution and by the Societies Act and Companies Act.
Withdrawing or removing monies from an organization without proper authorization and which contravenes the company's constitution is a breach of trust and criminal in nature.
She should brace herself to be indicted.
Ling Ling Chatt,
It's not about ruling oneself or ruling the world; it's about the law and what is legally permissible.
CK,
The ROS will have to act against anyone who breach the Societies Act and its a criminal breach of trust case.
Egg Sucker,
Have a good laugh; But I think this case is not just a joke; it's criminal in nature.
Bodoh Sombong,
Your definition is correct but in the context of this present case, it must be looked at together with the Acts of Parliament and the constitution of the registered organization.
Rahu,
It's not just about individual or a family; it's about fiduciary duties and the law.
Jefus,
This Balkis is a charitable organization and the officers have fiduciary duties. They would not have the power or authority of simple companies or Sdn Bhd. It's a charitable org and are governed by strict nature of the laws.
Hopeful,
Maybe he should; I agree.
Hasilox,
That dinner is another issue; the transfer of monies is a breach of trust issue.
Gan,
It's not about showing color or political mileage. It's about the law and the fiduciary duties of officers in a social organization.
suck the cock of toyol too long... talk also tak ngam!
Hahaha!!
Post a Comment